Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #451384

Re: Einstein's 1905 Invalid Argument

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Einstein's 1905 Invalid Argument
Date	2018-03-04 01:10 +0000
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<p7fh26$1ohn$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<b4035e78-a572-429d-9461-801984327ad2@googlegroups.com> <2b6377f1-a415-40e3-ba10-549bab51678a@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

<numbernumber1964@gmail.com> wrote:
> To explain some aspects of how physics works. 
> 
> It’s also useful for make things people use. 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> Actually not. It relies on observations and assumptions, but no mechanism
> capable explaining it..... 

I disagree. But geometry is a mechanism. 

> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> 
> You can explain everything in physics if you have the right attitude.
> 
> 
> 
> It's really simple "your have to be honest with yourself and the results that you get".
> 
> 
> I give you the truth and you do everything you can to subvert it but that
> is part of human nature and I fully understand your dilemma and
> sympathetic to your situation.
> 
> 
> Go with Gods. And let not Evil stand in your way. Have many children and
> wifes or mistresses. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Thread

Re: Einstein's 1905 Invalid Argument numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-03-03 13:55 -0800
  Re: Einstein's 1905 Invalid Argument Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 01:10 +0000
    Re: Einstein's 1905 Invalid Argument benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-03 21:12 -0500
      Re: Einstein's 1905 Invalid Argument Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 02:34 +0000
      Re: Einstein's 1905 Invalid Argument Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-03-03 22:35 -0600
        Re: Einstein's 1905 Invalid Argument Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 14:04 +0000
          Re: Einstein's 1905 Invalid Argument mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-04 06:34 -0800
          Re: Einstein's 1905 Invalid Argument kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-04 06:48 -0800
            Re: Einstein's 1905 Invalid Argument Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 20:06 +0000
          Re: Einstein's 1905 Invalid Argument Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-03-04 10:52 -0600
            Re: Einstein's 1905 Invalid Argument Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 20:06 +0000
              Re: Einstein's 1905 Invalid Argument Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-03-05 00:07 -0600
                Re: Einstein's 1905 Invalid Argument kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-06 16:45 -0800
                Re: Einstein's 1905 Invalid Argument Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 03:21 +0000
                Re: Einstein's 1905 Invalid Argument kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-07 08:00 -0800
                Re: Einstein's 1905 Invalid Argument Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 17:14 +0000
                Re: Einstein's 1905 Invalid Argument mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-07 09:59 -0800
                Re: Einstein's 1905 Invalid Argument Ernie Shackelford <iugtar@ttrwrta.oc> - 2018-03-07 18:03 +0000
                Re: Einstein's 1905 Invalid Argument Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 19:54 +0000
                Re: Einstein's 1905 Invalid Argument mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-07 12:02 -0800
                Re: Einstein's 1905 Invalid Argument kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-03-07 13:58 -0800
                Re: Einstein's 1905 Invalid Argument Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 22:45 +0000
                Re: Einstein's 1905 Invalid Argument mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-07 21:03 -0800

csiph-web