Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #408188
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light |
| Date | 2017-02-07 06:50 +0100 |
| Organization | Good company |
| Message-ID | <o7bn31$3uo$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <4b7dec02-05ae-48b6-9896-44e3988337b8@googlegroups.com> <nMidnaxQS61Eag7FnZ2dnUU7_81j4p2d@giganews.com> <cf1099e7-ba53-4ac9-b1dc-73c6ad1a7be8@googlegroups.com> <s_CdnX3wbN1VBQXFnZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com> <ffefd4b1-9758-4dd2-b28d-7df4760a4dae@googlegroups.com> |
Dne 07/02/2017 v 05:35 Peter Riedt napsal(a): > On Monday, February 6, 2017 at 11:40:00 PM UTC+8, tjrob137 wrote: >> On 2/2/17 2/2/17 - 10:13 PM, Peter Riedt wrote:R >>> MMX is hailed as the most important experiment in modern physics. >> >> Hmmm. It's certainly one of the most important ones. >> >>> Why does it >>> have this status when its logic of c+v and c-v is not accepted (c+v and c-v >>> refuted by experiment). Without the variation of the speed of light the logic >>> of Michelson and his rationale for finding the aether is null and void. >> >> Why is this so difficult for you to understand? >> >> Yes, the THEORY which motivated Michelson to perform this (and related) >> experiments has been refuted. THAT'S BECAUSE WE LEARNED SOMETHING FROM THE >> EXPERIMENTS. >> >> The experiment itself does not depend on the theory that motivated it. >> > I agree but this is irrelevant. Relevant is the difference between Michelson (c+v and c-v) and Einstein (always c). If Michelson is wrong and Einstein is right, MMX is invalid, the gamma formula of Lorentz is invalid and the contention of Einstein that a non co-moving observer of a moving object can discern a contraction of the observed object has no basis. > You have not shown yet, why you think MMX is invalid. -- Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) A wise man guards words he says, as they say about him more, than he says about the subject.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Michelson confirms anisotropic light Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2017-02-01 20:13 -0800
Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-02-01 20:18 -0800
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2017-02-01 22:02 -0800
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-02-02 07:06 -0800
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2017-02-02 15:39 -0800
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-02-02 16:03 -0800
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2017-02-02 16:16 -0800
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-02-02 16:40 -0800
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2017-02-03 22:18 -0800
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-04 04:52 -0800
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2017-02-04 05:02 -0800
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-04 05:36 -0800
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2017-02-04 16:05 -0800
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-04 19:46 -0800
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2017-02-04 20:52 -0800
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-05 04:51 -0800
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-04 17:35 -0600
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-02-04 16:01 -0800
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-02-04 06:26 -0800
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2017-02-04 16:08 -0800
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-02-06 22:25 -0800
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-04 17:34 -0600
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-02 08:00 +0100
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2017-02-02 01:40 -0800
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-02 11:18 +0100
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-02 08:57 -0600
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-02 08:58 -0800
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-03 09:28 -0800
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2017-02-03 18:19 -0800
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-05 17:36 +0100
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt hard at work alsor@interia.pl - 2017-02-02 18:37 -0800
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-02-02 09:30 -0600
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2017-02-02 15:47 -0800
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-02-02 21:24 -0600
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2017-02-02 20:13 -0800
Cretin Peter Riedt perseveres "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-02-02 21:00 -0800
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt perseveres Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2017-02-02 23:14 -0800
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt perseveres mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-02-02 23:18 -0800
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt perseveres Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-03 04:19 -0800
Re: Cretin Peter Riedt perseveres "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-02-03 06:28 -0800
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-02-06 09:39 -0600
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2017-02-06 20:35 -0800
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 06:50 +0100
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-07 05:22 -0800
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2017-02-07 16:27 -0800
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-07 17:15 -0800
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2017-02-07 18:21 -0800
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-07 18:34 -0800
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-07 19:55 -0800
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 06:48 +0100
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-02-07 23:38 -0800
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 07:37 +0100
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-07 17:26 -0800
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 08:02 +0100
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 08:22 +0100
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-02-07 23:41 -0800
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-02-07 23:39 -0800
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 08:36 -0600
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 08:37 -0600
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2017-02-08 16:58 -0800
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-08 20:15 -0500
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2017-02-08 18:46 -0800
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 07:39 +0100
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-02-08 22:56 -0800
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 07:58 +0100
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2017-02-08 23:32 -0800
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 08:40 +0100
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2017-02-08 23:36 -0800
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 08:42 +0100
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 08:43 +0100
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 08:53 +0100
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 08:59 +0100
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-02-09 00:20 -0800
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-02-09 07:22 -0800
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-02-02 22:55 -0800
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light alsor@interia.pl - 2017-02-03 12:15 -0800
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-03 12:36 -0800
Re: Michelson confirms anisotropic light numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-03 12:32 -0800
csiph-web