Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #407670
| From | Irvin Starrett <etrrarn@arneir.etr> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: The Second Law of Thermodynamics Is Unreasonable in a Structured World |
| Date | 2017-02-03 04:35 +0000 |
| Organization | Irvin Starrett Institute |
| Message-ID | <o711b7$p61$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <57b100a9-662f-4fe2-8a0b-086ceee2f297@googlegroups.com> <f5ad867d-6493-4d30-9a3a-4a5031ee59d9@googlegroups.com> <e7d0887d-3ea1-4b6c-b65b-817e60c6be4e@googlegroups.com> <1fe18b15-8d8e-458b-bd57-7cbeab8caba4@googlegroups.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Pentcho Valev wrote: > Thermodynamics contributed to the destruction of human rationality just > as vigorously as Einstein's relativity did: Not at all, but the later only. Vigorously, as you correctly say. Thank you. > http://www.bourbaphy.fr/price.pdf > Huw Price, Time's Arrow and Eddington's Challenge, p. 122: "A lot of > time and ink has been devoted to the question how entropy should be > defined, or whether it can be defined at all in certain cases (e.g., > for the universe as a whole). It would be easy to get the impression > that the puzzle of the thermodynamic asymmetry depends on all this > discussion - that whether there's really a puzzle depends on how, and > whether, entropy can be defined, perhaps." He doesn't understand his Tensors. A proof for Entropy would be that it always goes in one direction only. Here locally. However, it would be relatively easy to refute, by making it goes towards the opposite direction. I think this is possibly, but NOT locally. As you and your valued readers clearly can see, it is again spatially dependent. Very funny indeed. Fully consistent with my Divergent Matter theory.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Second Law of Thermodynamics Is Unreasonable in a Structured World Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-31 04:16 -0800
Re: The Second Law of Thermodynamics Is Unreasonable in a Structured World Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-31 05:01 -0800
Re: The Second Law of Thermodynamics Is Unreasonable in a Structured World Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-31 10:51 -0800
Re: The Second Law of Thermodynamics Is Unreasonable in a Structured World Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-02 04:58 -0800
Re: The Second Law of Thermodynamics Is Unreasonable in a Structured World Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-02 22:27 +0000
Re: The Second Law of Thermodynamics Is Unreasonable in a Structured World Irvin Starrett <etrrarn@arneir.etr> - 2017-02-03 04:35 +0000
Re: The Second Law of Thermodynamics Is Unreasonable in a Structured World Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-03 09:21 +0000
Re: The Second Law of Thermodynamics Is Unreasonable in a Structured World Emmaline Coots <ealoa@loealoioa.los> - 2017-02-03 19:35 +0000
Re: The Second Law of Thermodynamics Is Unreasonable in a Structured World Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-03 21:01 +0000
Re: The Second Law of Thermodynamics Is Unreasonable in a Structured World Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-01-31 19:32 +0000
csiph-web