Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #407670

Re: The Second Law of Thermodynamics Is Unreasonable in a Structured World

From Irvin Starrett <etrrarn@arneir.etr>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject Re: The Second Law of Thermodynamics Is Unreasonable in a Structured World
Date 2017-02-03 04:35 +0000
Organization Irvin Starrett Institute
Message-ID <o711b7$p61$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <57b100a9-662f-4fe2-8a0b-086ceee2f297@googlegroups.com> <f5ad867d-6493-4d30-9a3a-4a5031ee59d9@googlegroups.com> <e7d0887d-3ea1-4b6c-b65b-817e60c6be4e@googlegroups.com> <1fe18b15-8d8e-458b-bd57-7cbeab8caba4@googlegroups.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Pentcho Valev wrote:

> Thermodynamics contributed to the destruction of human rationality just
> as vigorously as Einstein's relativity did:

Not at all, but the later only. Vigorously, as you correctly say. Thank 
you.

> http://www.bourbaphy.fr/price.pdf
>  Huw Price, Time's Arrow and Eddington's Challenge, p. 122: "A lot of
>  time and ink has been devoted to the question how entropy should be
>  defined, or whether it can be defined at all in certain cases (e.g.,
>  for the universe as a whole). It would be easy to get the impression
>  that the puzzle of the thermodynamic asymmetry depends on all this
>  discussion - that whether there's really a puzzle depends on how, and
>  whether, entropy can be defined, perhaps."

He doesn't understand his Tensors. A proof for Entropy would be that it 
always goes in one direction only. Here locally. However, it would be 
relatively easy to refute, by making it goes towards the opposite 
direction. I think this is possibly, but NOT locally.

As you and your valued readers clearly can see, it is again spatially 
dependent. Very funny indeed. Fully consistent with my Divergent Matter 
theory.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

The Second Law of Thermodynamics Is Unreasonable in a Structured World Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-31 04:16 -0800
  Re: The Second Law of Thermodynamics Is Unreasonable in a Structured World Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-31 05:01 -0800
    Re: The Second Law of Thermodynamics Is Unreasonable in a Structured World Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-31 10:51 -0800
      Re: The Second Law of Thermodynamics Is Unreasonable in a Structured World Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-02 04:58 -0800
        Re: The Second Law of Thermodynamics Is Unreasonable in a Structured World Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-02 22:27 +0000
        Re: The Second Law of Thermodynamics Is Unreasonable in a Structured World Irvin Starrett <etrrarn@arneir.etr> - 2017-02-03 04:35 +0000
          Re: The Second Law of Thermodynamics Is Unreasonable in a Structured World Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-03 09:21 +0000
            Re: The Second Law of Thermodynamics Is Unreasonable in a Structured World Emmaline Coots <ealoa@loealoioa.los> - 2017-02-03 19:35 +0000
              Re: The Second Law of Thermodynamics Is Unreasonable in a Structured World Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-02-03 21:01 +0000
  Re: The Second Law of Thermodynamics Is Unreasonable in a Structured World Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-01-31 19:32 +0000

csiph-web