Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #401624
| From | bartekltg <bartekltg@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Calculating elements of objects in the solar system without G |
| Date | 2016-12-13 16:39 +0100 |
| Organization | ATMAN - ATM S.A. |
| Message-ID | <o2p4na$mff$1@node1.news.atman.pl> (permalink) |
| References | <a139b8ce-eeb0-4703-ac04-c49c7702573a@googlegroups.com> <o2o1p5$tvb$4@dont-email.me> <07cad27c-a53a-4211-bda1-4eb237a5d78d@googlegroups.com> |
On 13.12.2016 06:58, Peter Riedt wrote: > On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 at 1:44:25 PM UTC+8, Poutnik wrote: >> Dne 13/12/2016 v 04:17 Peter Riedt napsal(a): >>> Calculating elements of objects in the solar system without G >>> >>> The following elements of solar objects can be calculated without G but using the constant 79.2216: >>> >>> 1. M - the Mass of the sun M = am3/t2*79.2216-mpl >>> >>> 2. mpl - the mass of a planet or other free fall objects >>> mpl = am3/t2*79.2216-M >>> >>> 3. am - the semi major axis am = (t2*(mpl+M)/79.2216)^(1/3) >>> >>> 4. t - the orbital time of a free fall object >>> t = sqrt((am^3*79.2216)/(mpl+M)) >>> >> I am afraid your ignorance is progressive. >> You were already told that your constant contain G implicitly. >> >> -- >> Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) >> >> A wise man guards words he says, >> as they say about him more, >> than he says about the subject. > > Calculate 4pi^2 / G and see what you get. I have done it, and you have answered me post _before_ send this one! http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=(4*pi%5E2+%2F+G)++in+ (kg+*day%5E2%2Fmeter%5E3+) 79.24 kg days^2/m^3 (kilogram days squared per meter cubed) Most of the physical quantities aren't numbers, but numbers with unit. And when you change unit, you change numerical value of that thing that stood before unit ;-) When student get wrong number, he just done exercise wrong. If he get wrong unit, or don't write unit at all, propably he have no idea what he is doing. So think one more time, are you sure tou want to write a sentence like this: "...using the constant 79.2216" :-) bartekltg
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Calculating elements of objects in the solar system without G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-12 19:17 -0800
Re: Calculating elements of objects in the solar system without G "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-12 19:33 -0800
Re: Calculating elements of objects in the solar system without G "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-12 19:34 -0800
Re: Calculating elements of objects in the solar system without G "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-12 19:37 -0800
Imbecile Peter Riedt is also a stupid cheat "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-12-12 21:01 -0800
Re: Calculating elements of objects in the solar system without G Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 06:44 +0100
Re: Calculating elements of objects in the solar system without G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-12 21:58 -0800
Re: Calculating elements of objects in the solar system without G "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-12-12 22:01 -0800
Re: Calculating elements of objects in the solar system without G bartekltg <bartekltg@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 16:39 +0100
Re: Calculating elements of objects in the solar system without G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-13 15:28 -0800
Re: Calculating elements of objects in the solar system without G Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 16:32 -0800
Re: Calculating elements of objects in the solar system without G Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-12-13 16:42 -0800
Re: Calculating elements of objects in the solar system without G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-13 17:51 -0800
Re: Calculating elements of objects in the solar system without G "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-12-13 17:24 -0800
csiph-web