Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #401230
| From | Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Can “vector, co-vector pairs” simply lead to the Schwarzschild metric? |
| Date | 2016-12-10 00:39 +0100 |
| Organization | @somewhere |
| Message-ID | <o2ffbp$499$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <ff72babf-0c26-4258-9641-81c452dc6c98@googlegroups.com> |
Op 08-dec-2016 om 20:16 schreef chemguy: > Each point in the continuum may be associated with a vector and a > co-vector (vector pair). > > Both represent deformation of the continuum. One is a displacement > vector, representing the displacement of a point in the continuum due > to stress. The co-vector (incremental vector) represents a gradient > of displacement. > > Two frames of reference are required. The origin of each frame is a > point in the continuum. This gives four “field vectors” (a vector > pair at each origin). > > A field is defined if the components of the vector pairs are related > in some manner. The vector components (and geometries) are related by > “field rules”. > > If the vector types and the field rules are suitably defined, then > the Schwarzschild metric may be simply obtained. > > Please see; http://newstuff77.weebly.com/ (Schwarzschild page) Each continuum in a vector may be paired with a ntinuum or a co-ntinuum (pair association). Both continue representation of the deformation. One is vector displacement, pointing to the stress represented due to the continuum. The gradient (vector representation) displaces the co-vector. Two requirements reference the frame. The continuum of each point is a frame in the origin. This pairs each "origin field" (a field vector in four givens). If the Schwartzschild suits and the type fields are vectorially obtained, then the metric vector may be simply defined. Dirk Vdm
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Can “vector, co-vector pairs” simply lead to the Schwarzschild metric? chemguy <doulting@shaw.ca> - 2016-12-08 11:16 -0800
Can “vector, co-vector pairs” simply lead to the Schwarzschild metric? "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 13:19 -0800
Can “vector, co-vector pairs” simply lead to the Schwarzschild metric? "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 13:20 -0800
Can “vector, co-vector pairs” simply lead to the Schwarzschild metric? "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 13:39 -0800
Re: Can “vector, co-vector pairs” simply lead to the Schwarzschild metric? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-12-08 23:11 -0600
Re: Can “vector, co-vector pairs” simply lead to the Schwarzschild metric? "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-09 06:45 -0800
Re: Can “vector, co-vector pairs” simply lead to the Schwarzschild metric? Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2016-12-10 00:39 +0100
csiph-web