Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #396114

Re: KTX, another successful failure

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: KTX, another successful failure
Date	2016-10-19 07:39 -0500
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<nu7phm$460$5@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(8 earlier) <7e70dfec-1a29-4f77-91ea-1a7b15bad4de@googlegroups.com> <nu2urt$pkq$2@gioia.aioe.org> <d0005499-a801-4bc7-9369-4fff8e3e548c@googlegroups.com> <nu5ebn$k3r$2@gioia.aioe.org> <452921c4-c507-47f3-92c9-ed30345fe3c9@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 10/18/2016 8:30 PM, Peter Riedt wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 18, 2016 at 11:16:11 PM UTC+8, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> On 10/17/2016 7:56 PM, Peter Riedt wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, October 18, 2016 at 12:39:29 AM UTC+8, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>> On 10/17/2016 4:08 AM, Peter Riedt wrote:
>>>>> SR is a believe system.
>>>>
>>>> No sir. SR is a testable theory. In science, the way you determine what
>>>> things should be believed and what things should not is experimental
>>>> test. Period, end of story. If you are using any other metric to decide
>>>> what to believe and what not to believe from science, then you're not
>>>> thinking like a scientist. Period, end of story.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>
>>> I don't need to think as a scientist to be able to understand their
>>> inconsistencies. Einstein said there is no LC for comoving observers
>>> yet SR experts point to MMX, KTX, ISX and others to insist LC is real.
>>>
>>
>> That's not inconsistent. LC being real does not imply that comoving
>> observers should see LC. I think you have a misperception about what
>> "real" implies.
>>
>> Yes, you need to think as a scientist.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>
> I have the same 'misconception' as Einstein.
>

No, I really don't think you do. Where did Einstein say "real" means 
what you think it means? Quotation please.

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Thread

KTX, another successful failure Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-10-15 20:16 -0700
  Re: KTX, another successful failure Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-15 20:40 -0700
    Re: KTX, another successful failure Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-10-15 23:27 -0700
      Re: KTX, another successful failure Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-16 03:56 -0700
        Re: KTX, another successful failure jaymoseley@hotmail.com - 2016-10-16 06:26 -0700
          Re: KTX, another successful failure Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-16 06:39 -0700
      Re: KTX, another successful failure "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-10-16 08:05 -0700
        Re: KTX, another successful failure Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-10-16 16:25 -0700
          Re: KTX, another successful failure "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-10-16 17:15 -0700
            Re: KTX, another successful failure Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-10-16 19:57 -0700
              Re: KTX, another successful failure Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-16 20:36 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-10-17 00:30 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-17 04:20 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-10-17 02:08 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-17 02:46 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure ScottPN <Scott@oe0vgk3s.info> - 2016-10-17 10:08 +0000
                Re: KTX, another successful failure mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-17 03:28 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure ScottPN <Scott@oe0vgk3s.info> - 2016-10-17 10:48 +0000
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-18 17:27 +0100
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 11:29 -0500
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Jim Barthel <jimbart@portlanportal.info> - 2016-10-18 16:41 +0000
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-18 18:38 +0100
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Jim Barthel <jimbart@portlanportal.info> - 2016-10-18 16:38 +0000
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Jim Barthel <jimbart@portlanportal.info> - 2016-10-18 16:46 +0000
                Re: KTX, another successful failure paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 10:32 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Jim Barthel <jimbart@portlanportal.info> - 2016-10-18 18:39 +0000
                Re: KTX, another successful failure "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-10-18 19:31 +0200
                Re: KTX, another successful failure "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-10-17 06:57 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 11:39 -0500
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-10-17 17:56 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-10-17 19:14 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-10-17 19:58 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-10-18 00:38 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-10-18 01:53 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-10-18 07:40 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 10:16 -0500
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-10-18 18:30 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-10-18 18:42 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-10-18 21:03 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-10-18 21:24 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-10-18 22:48 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-10-18 19:11 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 07:39 -0500
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-10-19 16:43 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 19:46 -0500
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-10-19 10:55 -0500
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-10-19 16:48 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-10-19 20:03 -0500
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-10-19 19:31 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-10-20 09:53 -0500
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-10-20 17:15 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-20 19:03 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-10-20 21:03 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-21 04:08 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-10-21 18:02 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-21 20:17 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Dwain Foster <dwainbwe@tyrellysite.org> - 2016-10-22 12:46 +0000
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-10-22 17:25 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Edgar König <edgko@edgarkoenig.info> - 2016-10-23 11:47 +0000
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-10-23 18:04 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-20 23:53 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-17 23:22 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-10-18 00:21 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-10-18 00:38 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-10-18 01:55 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-10-18 07:41 -0700
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 10:28 -0500
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-10-19 11:02 -0500
                Re: KTX, another successful failure Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 10:26 -0500
              Re: KTX, another successful failure "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-10-16 21:32 -0700
    Re: KTX, another successful failure mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-17 01:31 -0700
  Another failure to comprehend from the resident imbecile Peter Riedt "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-10-15 21:02 -0700

csiph-web