Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #395000

Re: Final conceps of Einstein's relativity

Show all headers | View raw

On 10/6/2016 1:47 AM, Omar Shabsigh wrote:
> Dear Group
> Here is the final resul http://viXra.org/abs/1610.0044ts of my research about
> Einstein's relativity posted on: http://viXra.org/abs/1610.0044
>  and the abstract is:
>
> This research paper discusses the validity of Einstein’s relativity theory. It
> took four years of intensive work to reach the final conclusions. All assumptions
> of Einstein and his mathematics (where it exists) will be reviewed. Experiments
> done to show the validity will be restudied then we shall show their correctness
> under the constraints and conditions made by Einstein and show their practical
> and scientific value. We shall also show how much is the truthfulness of general
> relativity.
>
> Omar Shabsigh, Prof. Dr.
>

Omar, I completely understand that you feel very strongly that any 
statement by any physicist that imposes a limit on human accomplishments 
should be rejected. You feel that if there is a law of conservation of 
energy that prevents perpetual motion machines, then this is merely a 
mandate to mankind to find a way to break the law of conservation of 
energy. You feel that if there is a law of maximal speed, then this is 
nothing more than a proper challenge to break that law.

However, I just want to point out that you say you have done four years 
of "extensive research" into what relativity says, and yet you make 
immediate, silly mistakes like saying, "And we must not
forget the true  meaning of 'the outside independent observer of the 
moving object'. That term means exactly what it says: it is about an 
independent observer outside the moving object frame of reference. No 
more, no less." No, it doesn't mean that. What it DOES mean is discussed 
very clearly in good books on relativity. So it begs the question, what 
have you been doing in the past four years in your "extensive research". 
If you've not been reading solid references in relativity, then your 
"extensive research" has been largely four years of wasted time.


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Final conceps of Einstein's relativity Omar Shabsigh <omar.shabsigh@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 23:47 -0700
  Re: Final conceps of Einstein's relativity Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-10-06 09:54 +0200
    Re: Final conceps of Einstein's relativity Omar Shabsigh <omar.shabsigh@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 00:14 -0700
  Re: Final conceps of Einstein's relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 09:43 -0500
    Re: Final conceps of Einstein's relativity Omar Shabsigh <omar.shabsigh@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 00:03 -0700
      Re: Final conceps of Einstein's relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 07:52 -0500
  Re: Final conceps of Einstein's relativity "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-10-06 08:08 -0700
  Re: Final conceps of Einstein's relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-10-06 11:44 -0500
    Re: Final conceps of Einstein's relativity Omar Shabsigh <omar.shabsigh@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 00:11 -0700
      Re: Final conceps of Einstein's relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-10-07 08:04 -0500
      Re: Final conceps of Einstein's relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 08:11 -0500
        Re: Final conceps of Einstein's relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-07 06:55 -0700

csiph-web