Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #373277

Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one?

Path	csiph.com!goblin3!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed.neostrada.pl!unt-exc-01.news.neostrada.pl!wsisiz.edu.pl!newsfeed2.atman.pl!newsfeed.atman.pl!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one?
Date	Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:57:50 +0100
Organization	ATMAN - ATM S.A.
Lines	20
Message-ID	<n6e8b0$o7v$1@node2.news.atman.pl> (permalink)
References	<1f4ffc34-d2bb-491b-bb33-06aff96499b2@googlegroups.com> <5d02bf15-3911-422e-a741-45fdd8f182b9@googlegroups.com> <395cc84d-cae4-4625-97ba-c2ee15f37cd3@googlegroups.com> <943002b8-8df5-46da-b123-ce4086416d76@googlegroups.com> <n6dgi0$r8p$1@node1.news.atman.pl> <8c0b920d-55d3-427c-bb76-c29d6920f044@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host	89-71-197-70.dynamic.chello.pl
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-2"; reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding	quoted-printable
X-Trace	node2.news.atman.pl 1451926688 24831 89.71.197.70 (4 Jan 2016 16:58:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To	usenet@atman.pl
NNTP-Posting-Date	Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:58:08 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To	<8c0b920d-55d3-427c-bb76-c29d6920f044@googlegroups.com>
X-Priority	3
X-MSMail-Priority	Normal
Importance	Normal
X-Newsreader	Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3505.912
X-MimeOLE	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3505.912
Xref	csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:373277

Show key headers only | View raw

Użytkownik "JanPB"  napisał w wiadomości grup 
dyskusyjnych:8c0b920d-55d3-427c-bb76-c29d6920f044@googlegroups.com...

On Monday, January 4, 2016 at 2:12:18 AM UTC-8, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
> Użytkownik "JanPB"  napisał w wiadomości grup
> dyskusyjnych:943002b8-8df5-46da-b123-ce4086416d76@googlegroups.com...
>
>
> |You keep repeating those vacuous, totally vacuous, statements as if you
> knew what they meant.

|Reread what I wrote. I asked a concrete, technical question.

Reread, what you wrote. Technical? Buhahahahahahahahaha.
You obviously don't know, what this word mean. As expected
from a relativistic moron.

Thread

Is the Schw. solution the only one? partso2@yahoo.com - 2015-12-30 02:51 -0800
  Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-30 08:49 -0600
    Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2015-12-30 10:38 -0800
      Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Waye Kitchens <wscom@complang.net> - 2015-12-30 19:53 +0000
      Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-30 20:46 -0600
        Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2015-12-31 01:35 -0800
        Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-12-31 07:24 -0800
        Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-31 13:09 -0800
          Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2016-01-01 02:11 -0800
            Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-01 06:25 -0800
              Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2016-01-01 10:18 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-01 14:13 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2016-01-01 23:05 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-02 04:46 -0800
    Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Waye Kitchens <wscom@complang.net> - 2015-12-30 19:47 +0000
    Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? alsor@interia.pl - 2016-01-04 14:02 -0800
  Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-12-30 15:48 -0800
    Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-30 21:41 -0600
      Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-12-30 21:32 -0800
        Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-31 08:29 -0600
      Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-12-30 22:38 -0800
    Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-12-30 21:27 -0800
      Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-12-30 22:22 -0800
        Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-12-31 00:32 -0800
          Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-12-31 19:09 -0800
      Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-12-31 12:50 +0100
        Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-12-31 19:32 -0800
  Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-12-30 21:06 -0800
    Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Waye Kitchens <wscom@complang.net> - 2015-12-31 11:51 +0000
      Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Steven Carlip <carlip@physics.ucdavis.edu> - 2015-12-31 11:42 -0800
        Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-12-31 19:08 -0800
        Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Kathleen Winder <katwin@mcgatlin.org> - 2016-01-01 16:33 +0000
          Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-01 12:16 -0800
            Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Kathleen Winder <katwin@mcgatlin.org> - 2016-01-01 20:40 +0000
              Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-01 13:48 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Kathleen Winder <katwin@mcgatlin.org> - 2016-01-01 23:13 +0000
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 22:54 -0800
        Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-01-01 12:35 -0800
          Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 22:16 -0800
            Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 22:35 -0800
              Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 22:57 -0800
                Cretin Koobee Wublee "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-01-03 07:25 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 10:31 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 12:51 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 23:12 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 07:21 -0600
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 12:18 -0800
            Cretin Koobee Wublee "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-01-03 07:25 -0800
  Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-03 08:01 -0800
    Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 09:31 -0800
      Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-03 10:04 -0800
  Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-03 19:33 -0800
    Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 21:44 -0800
      Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 00:30 -0800
        Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-04 11:11 +0100
          Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 08:22 -0800
            Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-04 17:57 +0100
              Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 10:58 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-04 20:15 +0100
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 12:07 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-04 22:44 +0100
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 14:29 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-05 00:04 +0100
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 15:35 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-05 01:52 +0100
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 17:54 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? alsor@interia.pl - 2016-01-04 18:37 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Kathleen Winder <katwin@mcgatlin.org> - 2016-01-04 19:30 +0000
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 12:01 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Kathleen Winder <katwin@mcgatlin.org> - 2016-01-04 20:13 +0000
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 12:21 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Kathleen Winder <katwin@mcgatlin.org> - 2016-01-04 20:33 +0000
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 13:36 -0800
        Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 11:01 -0800
          Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-01-04 13:39 -0600
            Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Kathleen Winder <katwin@mcgatlin.org> - 2016-01-04 19:59 +0000
            Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 12:04 -0800
              Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-01-04 14:46 -0600
            Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-04 22:42 +0100
              Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 14:31 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-05 00:09 +0100
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 15:41 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-05 01:50 +0100
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 18:53 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-05 09:43 +0100
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 12:24 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-05 22:33 +0100
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 14:11 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-06 09:51 +0100
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-06 04:50 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-06 15:49 +0100
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 12:50 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 12:38 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-06 21:51 +0100
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 14:03 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 15:17 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Kathleen Winder <katwin@mcgatlin.org> - 2016-01-06 23:46 +0000
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 18:51 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-01-06 19:04 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Kathleen Winder <katwin@mcgatlin.org> - 2016-01-07 19:49 +0000
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-01-07 11:58 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Kathleen Winder <katwin@mcgatlin.org> - 2016-01-07 19:44 +0000
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 12:20 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-01-06 22:48 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 00:35 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-01-07 00:53 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 10:55 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-07 20:13 +0100
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-01-06 23:45 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 00:37 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-01-07 01:04 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 10:49 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-07 20:10 +0100
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 12:17 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-07 21:25 +0100
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 12:29 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-07 21:45 +0100
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 13:35 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-07 22:43 +0100
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 14:19 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Kathleen Winder <katwin@mcgatlin.org> - 2016-01-07 22:34 +0000
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-08 06:47 +0100
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-08 00:13 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-01-08 01:19 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-01-06 23:31 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 03:05 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-01-07 04:28 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 05:00 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-01-07 05:50 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 11:01 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-07 20:18 +0100
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Kathleen Winder <katwin@mcgatlin.org> - 2016-01-07 20:04 +0000
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 12:25 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-07 21:35 +0100
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 12:43 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-07 21:48 +0100
                Now we know, why The Shit matches reality so well... Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-07 17:12 +0100
                Re: Now we know, why The Shit matches reality so well... Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-07 08:47 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 15:10 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 16:31 -0800
            Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 22:04 -0800
              Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-01-04 22:22 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 22:41 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-01-05 09:51 -0800
              Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 12:25 -0800
  Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? partso2@yahoo.com - 2016-01-04 23:30 -0800
    Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Steven Carlip <carlip@physics.ucdavis.edu> - 2016-01-05 08:11 -0800
      Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 12:30 -0800
        Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-05 22:41 +0100
          Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 14:13 -0800
            Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 22:01 -0800
            Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-06 09:58 +0100
              Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 12:42 -0800
    Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-01-05 10:26 -0600
      Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-05 17:32 +0100
      Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 13:16 -0800
      Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? partso2@yahoo.com - 2016-01-06 23:54 -0800
  Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-06 07:46 -0800
    Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Kathleen Winder <katwin@mcgatlin.org> - 2016-01-06 15:47 +0000
      Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-07 07:40 -0800
        Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 10:42 -0800
          Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 11:06 -0800
            Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 12:31 -0800
          Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-08 08:21 -0800
            Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-08 09:53 -0800
              Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-08 10:17 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-08 13:31 -0600
              Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-08 11:11 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-08 20:42 +0100
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-08 15:52 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-08 16:12 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-08 16:16 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 15:29 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-09 19:37 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-10 00:29 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-10 01:46 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-10 23:58 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 10:15 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 14:14 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-01-11 22:56 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-10 07:39 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-01-10 10:43 -0600
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-10 16:34 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 00:07 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 10:22 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 14:14 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-10 19:42 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-10 20:01 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-11 08:44 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 10:23 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 14:15 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 14:18 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 16:58 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-11 20:51 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-01-10 22:07 -0600
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 00:24 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-11 08:49 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 00:16 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-11 08:51 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 09:48 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-08 19:46 -0800
                Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 15:32 -0800
  Is the Schw. solution the only one? David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-01-07 09:28 -0800
  Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? partso2@yahoo.com - 2016-01-16 22:58 -0800
    Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-17 10:54 +0100
      Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Carmine Portacio <carpo@trilogybearing.org> - 2016-01-17 13:26 +0000
    Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Steven Carlip <carlip@physics.ucdavis.edu> - 2016-01-17 10:49 -0800
      Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-17 23:45 -0800
    Re: Is the Schw. solution the only one? David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-19 01:02 -0800

csiph-web