Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #360262
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS NOT CONSTANT |
| Date | 2015-08-10 22:48 +0200 |
| Organization | ATMAN - ATM S.A. |
| Message-ID | <mqb2m1$v7e$1@node2.news.atman.pl> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <8dc3fe6b-a20f-4c63-a46c-0a2d23253a79@googlegroups.com> <mqal2q$9og$1@node1.news.atman.pl> <2b94b7ca-58ce-4fa8-a285-7335cfc5d4f1@googlegroups.com> <mqasgs$p26$1@node2.news.atman.pl> <6ea48a75-94d9-4e59-8f4f-261592d861c3@googlegroups.com> |
Użytkownik "Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato" napisał w wiadomości grup dyskusyjnych:6ea48a75-94d9-4e59-8f4f-261592d861c3@googlegroups.com... > |But the GPS ECI time is NOT the unique Galilean one; for example, the > |clocks showing the GPS ECI time are running a little slower than > |clocks showing the Solar system time (a known GPS experimental fact). > > Have you read definition we're talking about? |Of course, and you? Of course. > According to Einstein's own definition of time, time > is galilean. By experiment. > Game over, Ingenious Shit. |You seem not having yet read wit sufficient detail the 1905 Einstein |text; he is the first one talking about more than one time, i.e. a |completely different concept from the Galilean unique one. You seem not having yet read with sufficient detail the 1905 Einstein text; he is the first one talking about time as clock dependent. Well, maybe not the first - but neither Leibniz, nor Kant hasn't said directly, AFAIK (possibly I'm wrong). By Einstein's definition, time is what clocks indicate. Experiment shows, clocks on GPS indicate t'=t, with the precision of acceptable error. Thus, according to Einstein's own definition of time, time is galilean. By experiment. Good bye, Ingenious Shit.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS NOT CONSTANT Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-09 16:11 -0700
Re: THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS NOT CONSTANT Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-10 06:56 -0700
Re: THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS NOT CONSTANT rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 07:12 -0700
Re: THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS NOT CONSTANT Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 09:17 -0700
Re: THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS NOT CONSTANT Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-10 18:55 +0200
Re: THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS NOT CONSTANT Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 11:27 -0700
Re: THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS NOT CONSTANT Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-10 21:02 +0200
Re: THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS NOT CONSTANT Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 13:25 -0700
Re: THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS NOT CONSTANT Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-10 22:48 +0200
Re: THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS NOT CONSTANT Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 14:27 -0700
Re: THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS NOT CONSTANT alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-12 15:10 -0700
Re: THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS NOT CONSTANT Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-10 22:25 -0700
Re: THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS NOT CONSTANT Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-11 10:33 -0700
Re: THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS NOT CONSTANT Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-11 11:04 -0700
Re: THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS NOT CONSTANT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 15:55 -0700
csiph-web