Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #359624
| From | Bohuš Matuška <bohu@paranetnet.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: EM in warped space |
| Date | 2015-08-04 15:50 +0000 |
| Organization | Service Informatique SI Inc |
| Message-ID | <mpqn07$8vs$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <ac9aedec-9881-4adf-b1be-adf754cbf1a6@googlegroups.com> <9oudnfdXI7hjj13InZ2dnUU7_82dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Tom Roberts wrote: > On 8/3/15 8/3/15 3:10 PM, RichD wrote: >> I wonder, what happens to the Maxwell eqs., and the solutions, in a >> high gravity gradient, in GR? > > Here are Maxwell's equations in flat spacetime, written in the language > of differential forms: > dF = 0 *d*F = J > Here d is the exterior derivative, * is the Hodge dual operator, F is > the Maxwell 2-form, and J is the current 1-form. In terms of the > electromagnetic potential 1-form A: > F = dA > > > Here are the corresponding Einstein-Maxwell equations in curved > spacetime such that the energy density of the EM fields is negligible > (compared to other mass/energy that determines the geometry): > dF = 0 *d*F = J > Yes, they are the same, including the meanings of all the symbols. No, they are not the same. The former was Maxwell, the later Einstein is added to it: Einstein-Maxwell.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
EM in warped space RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-03 13:10 -0700
Re: EM in warped space John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 15:25 -0700
Re: EM in warped space John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 15:36 -0700
Re: EM in warped space Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-03 20:18 -0500
Re: EM in warped space Bohuš Matuška <bohu@paranetnet.net> - 2015-08-04 15:50 +0000
csiph-web