Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #359624

Re: EM in warped space

From Bohuš Matuška <bohu@paranetnet.net>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: EM in warped space
Date 2015-08-04 15:50 +0000
Organization Service Informatique SI Inc
Message-ID <mpqn07$8vs$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <ac9aedec-9881-4adf-b1be-adf754cbf1a6@googlegroups.com> <9oudnfdXI7hjj13InZ2dnUU7_82dnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Tom Roberts wrote:

> On 8/3/15 8/3/15   3:10 PM, RichD wrote:
>> I wonder, what happens to the Maxwell eqs., and the solutions, in a
>> high gravity gradient, in GR?
> 
> Here are Maxwell's equations in flat spacetime, written in the language
> of differential forms:
> 	dF = 0 *d*F = J
> Here d is the exterior derivative, * is the Hodge dual operator, F is
> the Maxwell 2-form, and J is the current 1-form. In terms of the
> electromagnetic potential 1-form A:
> 	F = dA
> 
> 
> Here are the corresponding Einstein-Maxwell equations in curved
> spacetime such that the energy density of the EM fields is negligible
> (compared to other mass/energy that determines the geometry):
> 	dF = 0 *d*F = J
> Yes, they are the same, including the meanings of all the symbols.

No, they are not the same. The former was Maxwell, the later Einstein is 
added to it: Einstein-Maxwell.
 

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

EM in warped space RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-03 13:10 -0700
  Re: EM in warped space John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 15:25 -0700
    Re: EM in warped space John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 15:36 -0700
  Re: EM in warped space Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-03 20:18 -0500
    Re: EM in warped space Bohuš Matuška <bohu@paranetnet.net> - 2015-08-04 15:50 +0000

csiph-web