Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #359527

Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE

From	Bohuš Matuška <bohu@paranetnet.net>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE
Date	2015-08-03 16:14 +0000
Organization	Service Informatique SI Inc
Message-ID	<mpo40b$kmp$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<5c4810df-53f2-4dea-b11f-fa431882bbac@googlegroups.com> <0382dd9c-9406-47ff-b363-f58dc3f913bb@googlegroups.com> <aa7d66b9-e7de-4a42-b6b5-9a5050466a4c@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Gary Harnagel wrote:

> On Sunday, August 2, 2015 at 10:02:37 AM UTC-6, Pentcho Valev wrote:
>>
>> In Einstein's 1905 scenario there is no turning-around period (only the
>> outward part of the trip is considered):
> 
> Of course not, unfortunate fool.  Einy wasn't describing the twin
> paradox. In fact, it hadn't been thought up yet.

I agree entirely. Many aftermath phenomena came much letter as a result of 
those inevitable consequences. Erroneously attributed to Einy, but his 
theory was too young even to be known at that time, much less to analyse 
its consequences. (I'm just guessing, but you are right).

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-02 14:07 -0700
  Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE Bohuš Matuška <bohu@paranetnet.net> - 2015-08-03 16:14 +0000

csiph-web