Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #456790
| Subject | Re: Question for EXPERTS on BANGS < >BIG or small< > |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| References | (1 earlier) <f014a879-94d4-47fc-91ca-022f1d81ae95@googlegroups.com> <A73DC.666431$Oy5.286920@fx11.am4> <14891c98-eed9-4eed-8fdf-bf2dc50afe4a@googlegroups.com> <VfhDC.688571$%a5.455112@fx21.am4> <c7d4f21a-7e15-4ae9-9124-08db93749b62@googlegroups.com> |
| From | Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> |
| Message-ID | <mmCDC.5928$AX1.5671@fx25.am4> (permalink) |
| Organization | virginmedia.com |
| Date | 2018-04-24 10:00 +0100 |
On 23/04/2018 13:40, Gary Harnagel wrote: > On Monday, April 23, 2018 at 2:59:35 AM UTC-6, Keith Stein wrote: >> On 23/04/2018 00:24, Gary Harnagel wrote: >>> On Sunday, April 22, 2018 at 10:54:58 AM UTC-6, Keith Stein wrote: >>>> No, but I am trying to suggest the Big Bang is nonsense. I favor a >>>> variable speed of light theory myself. >>> There is no evidence for that, at least locally. >> There is very much the same evidence as for the Big Bang, Mr.Harnagel. >> Either theory can explain the Hubble red-shifts, and the CMBR. The >> advantage of the light slowing explanation is that there is no need to >> invoke the additional, and highly speculative, theories of 'inflation' >> and 'dark energy'. > I'm neither an inflation nor a FLRW fan myself. Well there's something we agree on Mr.Harnagel, although to be honest i've no idea what "FLRW" is eh! >>> There would be serious >>> changes in all kinds of phenomena in distant stars and galaxies which we >>> CAN observe if it were different elsewhere. >> Like what exactly Mr'.Harnagel ? > So to address your question. If the speed of light were faster in the > past, many processes would be different. Just think of all the equations > describing physical values that have c in them, such as the fine-structure > constant: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-structure_constant#Is_the_fine-structure_constant_actually_constant? I do thank you for providing that relevant and thought provoking link, Mr.Harnagel. I was struck by the following little extract:- "......were α to change by 4%, stellar fusion would not produce carbon, so that carbon-based life would be impossible. If α were greater than 0.1, stellar fusion would be impossible and no place in the universe would be warm enough for life as we know it." From which i take you would imply that if the speed of light in intergalactic space were to change by 4% then .you and i would not be here to discuss it Mr.Harnagel. Well i think there is strong evidence that the speed of light has indeed changed by much more than 4%, and yet here we are eh! Also since the universe and therefore the intergalactic medium are clearly evolving, what else could one expect. > "Webb et al. found that their spectra were consistent with a slight increase > in α over the last 10–12 billion years." Specifically, 5.7x10^-6 parts per > ~10 billion years. > >>>>> I favor a continual series of bangs rather than continuous creation. >>>>> There is some theoretical basis for this in the work of Paul Steinhardt. >>> >>> What? No comment on my magnum opus? >> >> Well if you really want comments, i would suggest it is rather brief >> (for a magnum opus eh!), > > I don't cast me pearls before swine :-) > >> and also so far as i am aware there is no >> evidence for that. > Actually, the same evidence as for the big bang. > > https://everything2.com/title/ekpyrotic+universe "The Ekpyrotic model relies on the universe consisting of a five dimensional space-time, that is bounded by two (3+1)-dimensional surfaces (3-branes) which are separated by a finite gap. This corresponds to the 11 dimension universe we live in now,...." Your problem Mr.Harnagel is you can't recognize Bull Shit when you see it eh! keith stein
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Question for EXPERTS on BANGS < >BIG or small< > Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 14:16 +0100
Re: Question for EXPERTS on BANGS < >BIG or small< >typo corrected ,(we all make mistakes eh!) Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 14:26 +0100
Re: Question for EXPERTS on BANGS < >BIG or small< > Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-22 07:18 -0700
Re: Question for EXPERTS on BANGS < >BIG or small< > "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-22 07:50 -0700
Re: Question for EXPERTS on BANGS < >BIG or small< > Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 17:55 +0100
Re: Question for EXPERTS on BANGS < >BIG or small< > Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-22 16:24 -0700
Re: Question for EXPERTS on BANGS < >BIG or small< > Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 09:59 +0100
Re: Question for EXPERTS on BANGS < >BIG or small< > Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-23 05:40 -0700
Re: Question for EXPERTS on BANGS < >BIG or small< > Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 10:00 +0100
Re: Question for EXPERTS on BANGS < >BIG or small< > Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-24 04:19 -0700
Re: Question for EXPERTS on BANGS < >BIG or small< > Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 13:31 +0100
Re: Question for EXPERTS on BANGS < >BIG or small< > Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-24 09:03 -0700
Re: Question for EXPERTS on BANGS < >BIG or small< > "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-24 09:11 -0700
Re: Question for EXPERTS on BANGS < >BIG or small< > Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-04-25 10:09 -0700
Re: Question for EXPERTS on BANGS < >BIG or small< > Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-04-22 10:00 -0500
Re: Question for EXPERTS on BANGS < >BIG or small< > Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 17:40 +0100
Re: Question for EXPERTS on BANGS < >BIG or small< > Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-04-23 10:11 -0500
Re: Question for EXPERTS on BANGS < >BIG or small< > mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-04-23 11:06 -0700
Re: Question for EXPERTS on BANGS < >BIG or small< > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-24 17:33 +0200
Re: Question for EXPERTS on BANGS < >BIG or small< > Erálnì Histickému <no@ovmwk.gn> - 2018-04-24 18:17 +0000
Re: Question for EXPERTS on BANGS < >BIG or small< > Jonathan Doolin <good4usoul@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 03:12 -0700
Re: Question for EXPERTS on BANGS < >BIG or small< > "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-24 07:41 -0700
csiph-web