Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #616277
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics |
| Date | 2023-07-29 14:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kil6crFb0q2U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <kij402F12s6U1@mid.individual.net> <6f0882f8-00c4-4590-94f3-77ae84f76483n@googlegroups.com> <ae1ab269-8f9a-4753-8910-f18f7f0f1a3an@googlegroups.com> <kijlghF3tt5U1@mid.individual.net> <ef4455d9-a6f1-4212-99ea-2fd6daf23fbfn@googlegroups.com> |
On 7/29/2023 12:51 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 10:13:56 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >> On 7/28/2023 11:07 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >>> The amusing thing is that Einstein wasn't a mathematician or a physicist. >> So what do you *think* he was? > I don't consider anyone a physicist who can't understand the second > postulate contradicts the laws of physics, specifically Newton's first > law of motion and its corollary, Galileo's law of shared velocity. When a statement of "fact" is made as you did (above) it is not a statement of personal opinion as you have now revised what you wrote earlier. When anyone does this sort of thing their credibility suffers immensely. However there are ways to overcome that difficulty. > Why don't you find out what the critics and skeptics think he was? Because I don't care what the skeptics think. If one looks at Einstein's statements and behavior over his lifetime they may or may not see him as I do, as a narcissist. I don't detract from his intellect which clearly was sharp when viewing his intellectual contributions over his lifetime. You have been focused quite narrowly and while there is much contention about the elements within your myopic view it is clear that over the past century nobody has made a case strong enough to overturn the broad based acceptance of Einstein's body of work, or even any part of that. Should that strong a case be made I will follow the trend because I am no physicist and don't plan to become so expert in the field that what I say or think will have any substantial impact. Characterizing myself I consider that I am an above average conversationalist with very broad based interests. I readily acknowledge there are people brighter than myself and in this particular discussion landscape there are plenty who are inferior. As is part of the human burden I sometimes lose my temper. As is true for anyone with ethics I attempt to improve. > Ask Roger Schlafly. I don't care what Roger Schlafly thinks or says. I am, at this stage and for the purposes of discussions in this forum only concerned what a consensus among physicists offers. Because, like me, he is not a physicist, he and I are on equal footing here. If we were having a discussion pertinent to mathematics Roger would have a significant edge on me. Based on what I know about you the same fact set is true where you are concerned. I stay out of ad hominem criticisms. No you do not. there are a number of statements from your persona that I read as unequivocal ad hominem attacks directed at me. Bear in mind that I recognize you under your current posting identification as well as the one you were previously using. I don't care about credentials. Several times you did and you claimed I am not qualified to comment in sci.physics.relativity. I have always acknowledged that I am not a "professional scientist" of any sort. But under the charter for this discussion group credentials are not required for participation. That, like so many other things, is a two sided coin. Einstein doesn't really matter to me. That's certainly not the impression you've made here till now. If you want to rewind and reset the arguments I am certainly willing to listen, but please, please, bring on the beef in future. Broad generalizations don't cut it. > Relativity was already formulated before him. It is relativity I > take issue with. It is junk science. Please bring an "A" game to the discussion. Nothing more, or less, has been asked of anyone wishing to participate. Those who fall back on personal invective end up in kill files because that was the reason for creating that feature.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
How Einstein Ruined Physics Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-28 11:23 -0700
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-28 14:48 -0500
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-28 16:39 -0700
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-28 19:14 -0500
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-28 20:58 -0700
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-28 21:07 -0700
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-28 21:38 -0700
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-28 22:25 -0700
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-28 23:40 -0500
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-29 00:13 -0500
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-29 10:51 -0700
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-29 14:08 -0500
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-29 13:14 -0700
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-30 14:17 -0500
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-07-30 22:54 +0000
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-30 16:10 -0700
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 18:46 -0700
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-30 22:48 -0400
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-30 20:38 -0500
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-08-01 09:17 +0000
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-01 15:18 -0500
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-29 14:06 -0700
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-29 16:38 -0500
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-30 11:12 -0700
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-30 13:58 -0500
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-29 21:47 -0700
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-29 10:53 -0700
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-29 14:39 -0500
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-29 13:15 -0700
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-28 20:44 -0700
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-29 11:20 -0700
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-29 11:21 -0700
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 15:20 -0700
Re: How Einstein Ruined Physics Damien Tzaregradsky <rayt@iestyats.dr> - 2023-07-30 10:37 +0000
csiph-web