Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #461958
| Path | csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Instantaneous light proved |
| Date | Thu, 21 Jun 2018 11:46:52 +1000 |
| Lines | 19 |
| Message-ID | <fp0eceFbspkU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <fb5d3f12-25aa-44dc-ad50-5117f98a66b4@googlegroups.com> <Ns2dnXQmrZBBZ2fHnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com> <24413af0-5681-4c8d-97fb-4bb86edf9bfe@googlegroups.com> <pdfcmg$6cd$5@gioia.aioe.org> <ub6dnV4uUpDVAWbHnZ2dnUU7_8xj4p2d@giganews.com> <42311cdb-8f21-43b1-a1c9-0aaf7b785715@googlegroups.com> <foba96Fbqt5U1@mid.individual.net> <b5e1886a-a234-4f16-bd2e-b52a07033e1c@googlegroups.com> <fookbiFr9ndU1@mid.individual.net> <e46019be-a744-442e-bc83-618b1493ef7b@googlegroups.com> <b694072d-cfa9-4d51-b116-bcdf2ce064c6@googlegroups.com> <6889c950-ca6c-4f1a-87a9-879ae17a5a5a@googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net q/Fh2Xo+a1uo1hazO6FPYwOi+lLD1/fQAXAwKJ+SZ39IR3QmeJ |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:W8Eb6Yief1CRWbg9PXHMgI8sUuM= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 |
| In-Reply-To | <6889c950-ca6c-4f1a-87a9-879ae17a5a5a@googlegroups.com> |
| Content-Language | en-US |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:461958 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 21/06/2018 11:18 AM, John Gogo wrote: > On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 7:25:05 PM UTC-5, Gary Harnagel wrote: >> On Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 5:17:45 PM UTC-6, John Gogo lied: >>> >>> relativity says that there are no known macroscopic examples of the speed >>> of light which can give precision. >> >> Relativity doesn't say that. YOU are a liar. > > Convention says that there is no large scale factors which can demonstrate relativity. What do you think Michelson tried to do? > Michelson was trying to measure the speed of the Earth through the luminiferous aether, which was at the time the medium through which light waves were believed to travel. He (and later with Morley) certainly was not trying to demonstrate relativity because the theory had not yet been devised. Sylvia.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Instantaneous light proved Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-06-13 11:28 +1000
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-15 17:53 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-17 19:16 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-06-18 12:39 +1000
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-20 16:17 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-20 17:25 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-20 18:18 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-20 18:40 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-20 20:15 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-22 16:29 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-22 17:48 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 21:24 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-06-21 11:46 +1000
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-22 16:27 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-23 11:48 +0200
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-27 18:25 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-27 18:28 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-27 18:36 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-27 18:55 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-06-21 11:41 +1000
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-20 18:46 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-06-21 11:51 +1000
Re: Instantaneous light proved benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-21 02:18 -0400
Re: Instantaneous light proved Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 23:54 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-24 18:48 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-25 19:18 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-25 20:48 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-06-20 21:35 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-22 16:31 -0700
Re: Instantaneous light proved John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-20 18:49 -0700
csiph-web