Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #402242

Re: Formula for c

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Formula for c
Date	Mon, 19 Dec 2016 15:07:26 +1100
Lines	21
Message-ID	<ebp4nuFcea9U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<348f7ff8-0d5a-4e30-8a1b-5026450954cb@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	individual.net wVA9/EWpneS9ir6jhJs/9gM/S8fUM2SXiOeSqriKES5SmP4sQh
Cancel-Lock	sha1:lkwujk32A8p/ioU5LJVN5z8qnIM=
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
In-Reply-To	<348f7ff8-0d5a-4e30-8a1b-5026450954cb@googlegroups.com>
Xref	csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:402242

Show key headers only | View raw

On 19/12/2016 1:45 PM, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
> The speed of light has an old formula about the
> inverse square root of permeability times permittivity.
> Here is that epsilon*mu formula:
>
> c^2 = 1 / (epsilon*mu)
>
> epsilon = 2*87*r*tau^2 / (pi q)
>
> mu = 2 pi r second / (tau meter^2)
>
> c^2 = q meter^2 / (4*87 r^2 tau second)
>
> where r is proton radius .95fm, tau is 5.13ns,
> q is proton charge,

That is dimensionally inconsistent, which is another way of saying that 
it's wrong.

Sylvia.

Thread

Formula for c Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-12-18 18:45 -0800
  Formula for c "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-18 19:14 -0800
    Formula for c "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-18 19:45 -0800
  Re: Formula for c Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-19 15:07 +1100
    Re: Formula for c "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-18 20:31 -0800
      Re: Formula for c Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-19 15:46 +1100
        Re: Formula for c "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-18 21:33 -0800
          Re: Formula for c "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-18 21:48 -0800
            Re: Formula for c Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-19 17:07 +1100
              Re: Formula for c Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-12-19 07:44 -0800
        Re: Formula for c Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 02:21 -0800
          Re: Formula for c "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-23 03:18 -0800
            Re: Formula for c "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-23 03:39 -0800
              Re: Formula for c "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-23 03:57 -0800
                Re: Formula for c "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-23 04:24 -0800
                Re: Formula for c "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-23 04:59 -0800
  Re: Formula for c Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 19:28 -0800
  Re: Formula for c Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2016-12-23 13:03 +0100
  Re: Formula for c alsor@interia.pl - 2016-12-23 11:15 -0800

csiph-web