Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #401585

Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5)

Show key headers only | View raw

Am 10.12.2016 09:38, schrieb David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller:

>>> A 'white hole' is the same thing as a 'black hole', only time reverted.
>>>
>>> We could also assume, that the white hole is 'the other side' of a black
>>> hole.
>>>
>>> I actually think, this is true (both statements).
>>>
>>> This would require a geometric treatment of time and multiple timelines.
>>>
>>> Then to any timeline belongs one 'universe'. This is not universal, but
>>> actually a picture. It is in fact the past light cone of the observer.
>>>
>>> The future light cone is than similar to a white hole, which is the
>>> future light cone of a black hole.
>>>
>>>
>>> TH
>>>
>>> I Like it... again ... logical.
>>>
>>> http://vixra.org/pdf/1310.0191vC.pdf
>>>
>>> Like this link but interwoven into a Swiss cheese Schwartz P Minimal Surface neutralizing to opposing Farads
>>
>> Interesting paper. But I wanted 'big bang' to behave like a 'white hole'
>> (~'everything pops out of nowhere') and that as time-reverted version of
>> a black hole ('everything gets sucked into nothing').
>>
>> So we need to treat time in a geometrical way.
>>
>> There exist a book about this subject, which I like to recommend:
>>
>> http://www.sensibleuniverse.net/pages/book.html
>>
>>
>> He did something smart. He showed, that the stars found in the sky do
>> not fit to the standard model of cosmology.
>>
>> The method was to classify the content of a database of stars, that all
>> stars belong to certain sets of similar distance.
>>
>> These are (like shells of an onion) spherical layers of similar thickness.
>>
>> Now these layers have a thickness and therefore a volume.
>>
>> Somehow same volume should contain similar amount of stars. But that's
>> not the case (by about four orders of magnitude).
>>
>> So redshift cannot be translated to distance.
>>

> "So redshift cannot be translated to distance."
>
> Yep .. It seems More Likely Redshift is Correlated to Time, which is Correlated to Rising Homogeneous Isotropic Entropy
>

You could imagine to 'grab' the axis of time and rotate it slightly.

This would cause strange effects, since then timelike would be more 
spacelike.

For reasons of symmetry both timelines should be possible, but belong to 
different 'worlds'.

If you twist the axis of time, the objects in such a world would look 
like shifted in frequency.

You could twist them out of the visible spectrum and they get invisible.

Beyond the frequency of zero, they are gone from our world. But in their 
own world they still exist, but we are gone (seen from there).

We could also create blueshift. That is an increase in frequency and 
like a timeline pointing into our direction.

This creates the impression of 'neutron stars' for us. Those are just 
usual stars, which belong to a different 'time domain'.


TH

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-07 20:05 -0800
  Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-07 20:12 -0800
    Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-08 15:29 +1100
      Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-07 21:01 -0800
      Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-07 21:09 -0800
        Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-08 17:27 +1100
          Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 04:37 -0800
            Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 04:41 -0800
              Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 04:58 -0800
              Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 05:06 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 05:10 -0800
              Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-12-08 22:48 +0100
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 14:37 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-12-09 07:57 +0100
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-13 13:02 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-13 18:18 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-13 18:23 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 17:22 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-12-09 08:04 +0100
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-09 07:20 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-12-10 06:50 +0100
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-10 00:38 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-12-13 06:37 +0100
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-13 18:55 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-13 19:01 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-13 19:37 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-17 07:22 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-17 08:19 -0800
            Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-09 11:05 +1100
              Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 17:08 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-09 12:12 +1100
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 17:30 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-09 13:03 +1100
              Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 18:08 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 18:46 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 19:48 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 20:04 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-08 20:32 -0800
              Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 23:10 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-09 07:02 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-09 11:37 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-09 11:42 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-09 11:45 -0800
              Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-09 15:34 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-09 15:44 -0800
                Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-09 15:59 -0800
      Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-07 21:31 -0800
        Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-07 21:32 -0800
      Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-07 21:50 -0800
        Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-07 21:53 -0800
  Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-12-09 17:04 -0800
    Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-09 17:23 -0800
      Re: Speed of light derived SOLELY from pi, Koide, (RMS 0.5^0.5) "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-09 20:52 -0800

csiph-web