Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #387737

Re: Since When Is Physics Untestable?

From Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Since When Is Physics Untestable?
Date 2016-07-14 08:37 +0200
Message-ID <duoq9qFgl4iU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <63f6eaa7-0949-4256-a4c8-ca9673a7eeb0@googlegroups.com> <c51df607-d8a5-42f3-a348-24c15e086c00@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Am 14.07.2016 07:36, schrieb Pentcho Valev:
> The unlimited freedom to fudge the "theory" until it predicts anything one wants goes hand in hand with the temptation to fudge and even completely fabricate the evidence "confirming" the prediction. All evidence allegedly confirming Einstein's relativity is either fraudulent or inconclusive but Einsteinians have produced so much of it that no critical examination is possible - any criticism is overwhelmed and buried in the Augean stables. The fraud production was started by Arthur Eddington - perhaps the greatest fraudster in the history of science. His first (1919) fraud was breathtaking but his second was even more spectacular - in 1925 Eddington was already a gang boss:
>

Maybe the name 'Max Plan(c)k' is actually a pun - meaning 'large piece 
of wood'.

So we had to ask, if certain people have really existed (like e.g. 
Newton or Shakespeare) and had the name they bear and have done what 
they are famous for.

It would make some kind of sense, since somehow real science could 
eventually be dangerous to certain commercial interests, since people 
tend to believe in those, whom they regard as heroes.

So heroism is dangerous and needs to be faked in every single case.

To make fun of people, stupid 'pun-names' are used (like 'shake the bear').

(or: Hit-ler -> the man who hits)

So, how certain are you, that Picasso ('ace of spades' - for instance) 
has actually painted his many thousand pictures himself?

And who wrote all these books, you regard as masterpieces?


TH

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Since When Is Physics Untestable? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-13 02:21 -0700
  Re: Since When Is Physics Untestable? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-13 03:03 -0700
    Re: Since When Is Physics Untestable? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-07-14 07:29 +0200
  Re: Since When Is Physics Untestable? Jack Chardy <jackc@outlool.org> - 2016-07-13 19:47 +0000
  Re: Since When Is Physics Untestable? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-13 22:36 -0700
    Re: Since When Is Physics Untestable? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-07-14 08:37 +0200
    Re: Since When Is Physics Untestable? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-14 08:50 -0700

csiph-web