Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #387220

Re: Are Einsteinians Disguised Newtonians?

Show all headers | View raw

Am 02.07.2016 06:53, schrieb Thomas Heger:

>>>> This e=mc² again, I read many places not even Modern Science really
..

>>> Meant is actually the mass defect, that occurs with nuclear decay. Then
..
> So we had to discuss, what 'mass' does actually denote.
>
> As far as I could tell, the kg is a measure for inertia, not of energy
> of some kind.
>
> 'Energy' is something we ascribe to processes.
>
> So a kg of uranium is heavy and behaves inertial, while the beam
> originating from the metal has energy.
>
> Now we always think, what comes out must have been in before. So mass
> and energy are somehow related.
>
> Well, yes, but rays are not inertial and mass is not energetic.
>
> I prefer to use a different analogy and that is a gyroscope.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyroscope
>
> The simple form is called 'top' :
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top
>
> mass is then related to stability and rays are kind of 'rolling away
> effects'.
>
> This will happen, if the device gets tilted by an external force (or by
> slowing down or by an 'accident').
>
> And 'mass' (in the analogy: concentrated angular momentum) CAN roll away
> as 'ray', which would reduce 'mass' and gain 'energy' (rolling angular
> momentum).

It is actually possible to interpret h (Planck's constant) as unit of 
angular momentum and atoms as 'rotation waves'.

To 'generate' something, that could eventually rotate I take 'spacetime' 
and assume this to be a physical entity. This would be composed from 
something, hence some kind of pointlike elements exist and these could 
rotate.


How this is generated is kind of odd:

you can turn nothing into something, by splitting nothing into two 
opposing fractions, which would add to nothing.

So: 0 = -1 + 1

Similar could be done with 'anti-symmetric rotations'.

This is a form of rotation, that needs two turns to return to the 
previous state.

This has one half pointing up and the subsequent half pointing down.

They add to nothing.

If now one part is separated, we get two worlds, that are 
mirror-symmetric, but real, if seen from inside.

Now our world looks exactly like this, but seen from the inside and 
based on one part only. This one part is accompanied by an invisible 
counterpart, which we neither can see, nor want to encounter.

So our world is actually half of some sort of real thing and real to us 
as seen from within. These elements of spacetime could build structures 
and those are the things we see and feel.

The entire idea is called 'structured spacetime' and is based on group 
theory of the rotation groups SO3:

https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dd8jz2tx_3gfzvqgd6


TH

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Are Einsteinians Disguised Newtonians? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-06-30 09:20 -0700
  Re: Are Einsteinians Disguised Newtonians? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-06-30 10:25 -0700
    Re: Are Einsteinians Disguised Newtonians? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-06-30 12:44 -0700
      Re: Are Einsteinians Disguised Newtonians? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-06-30 22:01 +0200
        Re: Are Einsteinians Disguised Newtonians? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-06-30 23:53 -0700
      Re: Are Einsteinians Disguised Newtonians? "Dr. Bob John" <drbobjohn@hotmail.org> - 2016-06-30 20:28 +0000
        Re: Are Einsteinians Disguised Newtonians? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-06-30 15:05 -0700
      Re: Are Einsteinians Disguised Newtonians? Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2016-06-30 23:19 +0200
        Re: Are Einsteinians Disguised Newtonians? "Dr. Bob John" <drbobjohn@hotmail.org> - 2016-06-30 21:30 +0000
          Re: Are Einsteinians Disguised Newtonians? Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2016-06-30 23:51 +0200
        Re: Are Einsteinians Disguised Newtonians? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-06-30 15:08 -0700
  Re: Are Einsteinians Disguised Newtonians? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-06-30 12:43 -0700
  Re: Are Einsteinians Disguised Newtonians? "Dr. Bob John" <drbobjohn@hotmail.org> - 2016-06-30 20:24 +0000
    Re: Are Einsteinians Disguised Newtonians? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-07-01 11:09 +0200
      Re: Are Einsteinians Disguised Newtonians? Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 10:49 -0700
        Re: Are Einsteinians Disguised Newtonians? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-07-02 06:53 +0200
          Re: Are Einsteinians Disguised Newtonians? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-07-05 07:54 +0200
  Re: Are Einsteinians Disguised Newtonians? Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2016-06-30 13:39 -0700
  Re: Are Einsteinians Disguised Newtonians? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-30 16:16 -0700
  Re: Are Einsteinians Disguised Newtonians? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 21:29 +0800
    Re: Are Einsteinians Disguised Newtonians? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-07-01 22:06 +0200

csiph-web