Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #374822
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: All orbits are swiveling ellipses albeit very small is the norm |
| Date | 2016-01-26 10:17 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <dgnonvFa94uU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <2fd6ecae-8ad1-47b0-a536-18ef637795b4@googlegroups.com> <23d72d07-216c-4707-9947-9e4b9eb391df@googlegroups.com> <yKWdnWKxxK2xwTnLnZ2dnUU7_82dnZ2d@giganews.com> <dgllvsFo2roU1@mid.individual.net> <e2e24188-4114-46db-b858-a8d472c098e0@googlegroups.com> |
On 26/01/2016 3:41 AM, jamesl51165@gmail.com wrote: > On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 8:18:09 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 24/01/2016 4:07 PM, Tom Roberts wrote: >>> On 1/23/16 1/23/16 9:01 PM, John Gogo wrote: >>>> So, you are basically saying that orbits are mostly, nearly perfectly >>>> circular- which is what I have been saying. >>> >>> And you are wrong. Yes, the eight planets have reasonably circular >>> orbits except for Mercury. But most large asteroids and dwarf planets >>> like Pluto do not have circular orbits, and there are more of them than >>> planets. Moreover, there are over 700 comets that have been observed, >>> and NONE of them have an orbit that is anywhere close to circular. >>> >>> Part of this is selection bias -- to be notable an orbiting object must >>> be observed. But if an inner solar system object had an eccentricity >>> comparable to a long-period comet (0.97-0.99), it would never have been >>> observed by humans because it would have melted or broken up long ago >>> (coming so close to the sun). So the only objects in highly elliptical >>> orbits are far from the sun and have periods of hundred to thousands of >>> years (or longer, c.f. the newly discovered "Planet 9"); Halley's comet >>> is a rarity (period only 75 years). >>> >>> Mathematically, the set of circular orbits is minuscule >>> within the set of all possible orbits. That is, the vast >>> majority of all possible orbits are not circular at all. >>> >>> In addition, most extrasolar planets whose eccentricities are known have >>> values more than ten times that of earth. >>> >>> It's remarkable (and sad) that you have opinions on so many >>> things you clearly know nothing about. You really should >>> learn how to recognize when you don't know something. >>> >>> >>> Tom Roberts >> >> I think James may have been referring to apsidal precession, first >> noticed in the orbit of Mercury. But saying that it applies to all >> orbits is only stating what's already well known. >> >> Sylvia. > > Look at the speed of the Earth in orbit. It accelerates by the very small > then it is taken back. The increase in speed is micro for the Earth orbiting > around the sun. Look at the orbital strength of gravity only accelerating by > the smallest difference that creates ellipses (that swivel) > > Mitchell Raemsch > > Nope - that's completely incomprehensible. Sylvia.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
All orbits are swiveling ellipses albeit very small is the norm jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-01-23 12:42 -0800
Re: All orbits are swiveling ellipses albeit very small is the norm John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-23 19:01 -0800
Re: All orbits are swiveling ellipses albeit very small is the norm John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-23 20:35 -0800
Re: All orbits are swiveling ellipses albeit very small is the norm Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-01-23 23:07 -0600
Re: All orbits are swiveling ellipses albeit very small is the norm Watto Chewbacca <watchu@wattochewbacca.org> - 2016-01-24 21:12 +0000
Re: All orbits are swiveling ellipses albeit very small is the norm "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-01-25 20:16 +0100
Re: All orbits are swiveling ellipses albeit very small is the norm Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-25 15:18 +1100
Re: All orbits are swiveling ellipses albeit very small is the norm jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-01-25 08:41 -0800
Re: All orbits are swiveling ellipses albeit very small is the norm Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-26 10:17 +1100
Re: All orbits are swiveling ellipses albeit very small is the norm John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-26 14:57 -0800
Re: All orbits are swiveling ellipses albeit very small is the norm John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-26 14:59 -0800
Re: All orbits are swiveling ellipses albeit very small is the norm John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-26 15:01 -0800
Re: All orbits are swiveling ellipses albeit very small is the norm John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-26 17:27 -0800
Re: All orbits are swiveling ellipses albeit very small is the norm John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-02 19:42 -0800
Re: All orbits are swiveling ellipses albeit very small is the norm Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-03 23:41 +1100
csiph-web