Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #367570

Re: Let's talk about "TECHNICAL aspects".

From	Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Let's talk about "TECHNICAL aspects".
Date	2015-10-20 12:24 +1100
Message-ID	<d8lje4F1e8jU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<n00375$f3o$1@node1.news.atman.pl> <d8jdrjFebcbU1@mid.individual.net> <24f082e3-537d-46ce-b144-e1ec45a68f62@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 20/10/2015 6:02 AM, alsor@interia.pl wrote:
> W dniu poniedziałek, 19 października 2015 07:36:55 UTC+2 użytkownik Sylvia Else napisał:
>> On 18/10/2015 11:27 PM, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Użytkownik "JanPB"  napisał w wiadomości grup
>>> dyskusyjnych:ca7b185d-0432-4ed9-b275-15f8feceeec7@googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>> |What Maciej does OTOH is reaching conclusions (like "all physicists are
>>> |idiots") which are not of that type - they can only be reached after
>>> |a serious and detailed study of TECHNICAL aspects.
>>>
>>>
>>> So, let's talk about TECHNICAL aspects of The Shit, will we?
>>> How to determine your moronic interval between two real
>>> events, for instance, battle of Waterloo and battle of Gaugamela?
>>
>> About -4.6 million square light-years. In this instance, the major
>> separation is in time, with the distance separation being insignificant
>> by comparison.
>>
>> Sylvia.
>
> a square of metre is a measure of surface, not a distance, bebe.
>

It's a quantity with the dimension distance squared, and that is the 
dimension of a space-time interval.

Sylvia.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Let's talk about "TECHNICAL aspects". Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-10-18 14:27 +0200
  Re: Let's talk about "TECHNICAL aspects". JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-10-18 18:53 -0700
    Re: Let's talk about "TECHNICAL aspects". mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-10-18 23:13 -0700
  Re: Let's talk about "TECHNICAL aspects". Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-19 16:36 +1100
    Re: Let's talk about "TECHNICAL aspects". mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-10-18 23:01 -0700
      Re: Let's talk about "TECHNICAL aspects". Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-19 18:52 +1100
        Re: Let's talk about "TECHNICAL aspects". mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-10-19 01:25 -0700
          Re: Let's talk about "TECHNICAL aspects". Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-19 19:56 +1100
            Re: Let's talk about "TECHNICAL aspects". mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-10-19 02:57 -0700
              Re: Let's talk about "TECHNICAL aspects". Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-20 12:22 +1100
                Re: Let's talk about "TECHNICAL aspects". mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-10-19 23:27 -0700
                Re: Let's talk about "TECHNICAL aspects". Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-20 19:29 +1100
                Re: Let's talk about "TECHNICAL aspects". mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-10-20 02:14 -0700
                Re: Let's talk about "TECHNICAL aspects". Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-20 20:29 +1100
                Re: Let's talk about "TECHNICAL aspects". mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-10-20 02:45 -0700
    Re: Let's talk about "TECHNICAL aspects". alsor@interia.pl - 2015-10-19 12:02 -0700
      Re: Let's talk about "TECHNICAL aspects". paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-10-19 12:25 -0700
        Re: Let's talk about "TECHNICAL aspects". Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-10-19 22:55 +0200
          Re: Let's talk about "TECHNICAL aspects". paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-10-19 17:14 -0700
            Re: Let's talk about "TECHNICAL aspects". mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-10-19 23:39 -0700
      Re: Let's talk about "TECHNICAL aspects". Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-20 12:24 +1100

csiph-web