Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #359793
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: LOGICAL REFUTATION OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY |
| Date | 2015-08-06 18:58 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <d2glu7Fg0rqU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <70a04d91-cc40-406d-8610-9c730a895e8d@googlegroups.com> <d2gd68Fdt1eU1@mid.individual.net> <2ecd90e4-4635-4b94-a4b3-5a2254d167e6@googlegroups.com> |
On 6/08/2015 4:58 PM, Pentcho Valev wrote:
> "Moving clocks tick slower" ("the clock moved from A to B lags behind the other which has remained at B"), even though it does not follow from the postulates of Einstein's special relativity, was fraudulently (or stupidly) introduced as a valid conclusion in Einstein's 1905 paper:
>
> http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
> ON THE ECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES, A. Einstein, 1905: "From this there ensues the following peculiar consequence. If at the points A and B of K there are stationary clocks which, viewed in the stationary system, are synchronous; and if the clock at A is moved with the velocity v along the line AB to B, then on its arrival at B the two clocks no longer synchronize, but the clock moved from A to B lags behind the other which has remained at B by tv^2/2c^2 (up to magnitudes of fourth and higher order), t being the time occupied in the journey from A to B."
>
> The valid conclusions are:
>
> (A) The clock moved from A to B lags behind the other which has remained at B, as judged from the stationary system.
>
> (B) The clock which has remained at B lags behind the one moved from A to B, as judged from the moving system.
These are not valid conclusions. The word "lags" relates to positions,
whereas the original propositions related to rates. Did you think no one
would notice?
Sylvia.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
LOGICAL REFUTATION OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-05 23:23 -0700
Re: LOGICAL REFUTATION OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-08-06 16:29 +1000
Re: LOGICAL REFUTATION OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-05 23:58 -0700
Re: LOGICAL REFUTATION OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-08-06 18:58 +1000
Re: LOGICAL REFUTATION OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-06 04:06 -0700
Re: LOGICAL REFUTATION OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-08-06 22:56 +1000
Re: LOGICAL REFUTATION OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-06 06:28 -0700
Re: LOGICAL REFUTATION OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-08-06 23:42 +1000
Re: LOGICAL REFUTATION OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 07:55 -0700
Re: LOGICAL REFUTATION OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-06 08:37 -0700
Re: LOGICAL REFUTATION OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 12:34 -0700
Re: LOGICAL REFUTATION OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-08-06 08:30 -0700
Re: LOGICAL REFUTATION OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 03:43 -0700
Re: LOGICAL REFUTATION OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-06 08:43 -0700
Re: LOGICAL REFUTATION OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 14:21 -0700
Re: LOGICAL REFUTATION OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-06 08:55 -0500
Re: LOGICAL REFUTATION OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 12:05 -0700
Re: LOGICAL REFUTATION OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 21:47 +0200
Re: LOGICAL REFUTATION OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-06 21:50 +0200
Re: LOGICAL REFUTATION OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-06 13:41 -0700
csiph-web