Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #674964

Re: Fat books

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups alt.usage.english, sci.physics.relativity, rec.arts.tv
Subject Re: Fat books
Date 2026-10-24 21:35 -0700
Organization The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID <6ADD86F5.29B1@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References (8 earlier) <1792825259-12588@newsgrouper.org> <nk33usF902qU1@mid.individual.net> <nk3ckuFai6vU1@mid.individual.net> <nk3dauFaj94U1@mid.individual.net> <n9bpdld880ucr6gu1ub67ggh6l0bomb0ep@4ax.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Tony Cooper wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 24 Oct 2026 10:50:22 +0100, Hibou
> <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> 
> >Le 24/10/2026 à 10:38, occam a écrit :
> >> On 24/10/2026 09:10, Hibou wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps that was an instance of Heaven on Earth - but what were the
> >>> faithful to do if they couldn't find a willing extramarital partner?
> >>
> >> Or it [absence of a 'not'] was an early instance of a Freudian slip.
> >> Given the current state of adultery, it is proof that Freudian slips do
> >> matter.
> >
> >
> >Hmm. What is the current state of adultery¹? Is it increasing? Is it
> >usefully driving economic growth (all those little gifts - and big ones
> >too)?
> >
> "Adultery" is defined as "consensual sexual intercourse between a
> married person and a person other than the spouse".
> 
> The number of couples that live together in a long-term relationship,
> but do not marry, is increasing.  If one of people in that arrangement
> has consensual sexual intercourse with a person other than the person
> they live with, is it still "adultery"?


The word that applies to both is called...cheating.


"Cheaters"


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LduCULxgNcc


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Fat books The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-24 21:35 -0700
  Re: Fat books squalk <sq@net.invalid> - 2026-10-25 20:34 +0000
    Re: Fat books Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-25 14:56 -0700

csiph-web