Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #674341

Re: Einstein in 1915

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Einstein in 1915
Date 2026-10-11 15:34 -0700
Organization The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID <6ACC0F07.6435@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References <6AC93084.3CEB@ix.netcom.com> <1s2qf0d.gu2x06ualgnfN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <6AC98224.39ED@ix.netcom.com> <6ACA6E3F.4632@ix.netcom.com> <6ACAAE76.39A5@ix.netcom.com>

Show all headers | View raw


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > J. J. Lodder wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > What I don't understand is how could
> > > > > Albert Einstein come out with GR in 1915
> > > > > without accounting for the galaxies and the rest of the univese
> > > > > that he didn't know existed then???
> > > >
> > > > General Relativity holds for any universe, whatever is in it.
> > > > No different from Newton's theory of -universal- gravitation,
> > > >
> > > > Jan
> > >
> > > i didn't know the laws are the same everywhere...
> > >
> >
> > i guess that explains why einstein spent 30 years trying
> > to make gravity fit with quantum..
> >
> > Quantum is not part of the history of our universe.
> >
> > theory of everything translats to Gravity theory of everything.
> >
> > if it don't fit, you got to a quit.
> >
> > The universe is not mathematical, it's another entire new language very
> > far away.
> >
> > Don't buy a quantum computer, it's fake.
> 
> and too late..
> 
> What people want today is their own Ai Personal Home Computer...
> 
> https://www.techradar.com/ai-platforms-assistants/teen-founder-reveals-personal-ai-computer-for-running-local-agents-usd3-499-mac-mini-rival-runs-on-nvidia-rtx-pro-4000-gpu-and-promises-to-be-a-subscription-free-brain-in-a-box
> 
> 'you can dictate how much autonomy (God Mode) the Core agents are
> allowed, heavily restricting the AI should you prefer. '
> 
> (there's no subscription fee here).
> 
> The CEO assures us: "All of the source code, logic, and model weights
> live on the device, not the services. We build this device to not be
> dependent on having an outside entity maintaining the service."
> 
> Already sold out! I'm sure their would be competitors and Bill Gates all
> bought one to reverse engineer it.
> 
> Go rogue, or go home.
> 
> I would feed my ai personal computer all the back issuses of 2600
> magazine!!!


Here comes the bad guy...
https://www.foxnews.com/media/bill-gates-sounds-alarm-ai-powered-cyberattacks-warns-negative-surprises-within-year



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Einstein in 1915 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-09 11:20 -0700
  Re: Einstein in 1915 nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-10-09 21:45 +0200
    Re: Einstein in 1915 Gay Banana <rb@vedir.ru> - 2026-10-09 20:20 +0000
    Re: Einstein in 1915 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-09 17:09 -0700
      Re: Einstein in 1915 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-10 09:56 -0700
        Re: Einstein in 1915 Gay Banana <rymi@ekrer.ru> - 2026-10-10 17:01 +0000
        Re: Einstein in 1915 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-10 14:30 -0700
          Re: Einstein in 1915 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-11 15:34 -0700
            Re: Einstein in 1915 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-11 20:46 -0700
        Re: Einstein in 1915 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-11 21:46 -0700
    Re: Einstein in 1915 Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-10-10 07:15 +0200
      Re: Einstein in 1915 Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-09 22:22 -0700
        Re: Einstein in 1915 Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-09 22:23 -0700
        Re: Einstein in 1915 Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-10-10 12:55 +0200
          Re: Einstein in 1915 Gay Banana <eoowkn@jvnoa.ru> - 2026-10-10 15:36 +0000
            Re: Einstein in 1915 Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-10 08:44 -0700
              Re: Einstein in 1915 Jesee Beiman <emna@ijbbme.ru> - 2026-10-10 16:33 +0000
                Re: Einstein in 1915 Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-10 09:39 -0700
                Re: Einstein in 1915 Gay Banana <obpno@lnrccic.ru> - 2026-10-10 16:42 +0000
                Re: Einstein in 1915 Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-10 09:57 -0700
                Re: Einstein in 1915 Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-10 10:05 -0700
                Re: Einstein in 1915 Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-12 07:50 -0700
  Re: Einstein in 1915 x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-10-12 09:50 -0700
    Re: Einstein in 1915 Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-10-12 19:06 +0200
    Re: Einstein in 1915 Christal Bawidov <riwbd@ahiiwh.ru> - 2026-10-12 20:07 +0000

csiph-web