Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #674341
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Einstein in 1915 |
| Date | 2026-10-11 15:34 -0700 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <6ACC0F07.6435@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | <6AC93084.3CEB@ix.netcom.com> <1s2qf0d.gu2x06ualgnfN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <6AC98224.39ED@ix.netcom.com> <6ACA6E3F.4632@ix.netcom.com> <6ACAAE76.39A5@ix.netcom.com> |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > What I don't understand is how could > > > > > Albert Einstein come out with GR in 1915 > > > > > without accounting for the galaxies and the rest of the univese > > > > > that he didn't know existed then??? > > > > > > > > General Relativity holds for any universe, whatever is in it. > > > > No different from Newton's theory of -universal- gravitation, > > > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > i didn't know the laws are the same everywhere... > > > > > > > i guess that explains why einstein spent 30 years trying > > to make gravity fit with quantum.. > > > > Quantum is not part of the history of our universe. > > > > theory of everything translats to Gravity theory of everything. > > > > if it don't fit, you got to a quit. > > > > The universe is not mathematical, it's another entire new language very > > far away. > > > > Don't buy a quantum computer, it's fake. > > and too late.. > > What people want today is their own Ai Personal Home Computer... > > https://www.techradar.com/ai-platforms-assistants/teen-founder-reveals-personal-ai-computer-for-running-local-agents-usd3-499-mac-mini-rival-runs-on-nvidia-rtx-pro-4000-gpu-and-promises-to-be-a-subscription-free-brain-in-a-box > > 'you can dictate how much autonomy (God Mode) the Core agents are > allowed, heavily restricting the AI should you prefer. ' > > (there's no subscription fee here). > > The CEO assures us: "All of the source code, logic, and model weights > live on the device, not the services. We build this device to not be > dependent on having an outside entity maintaining the service." > > Already sold out! I'm sure their would be competitors and Bill Gates all > bought one to reverse engineer it. > > Go rogue, or go home. > > I would feed my ai personal computer all the back issuses of 2600 > magazine!!! Here comes the bad guy... https://www.foxnews.com/media/bill-gates-sounds-alarm-ai-powered-cyberattacks-warns-negative-surprises-within-year -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Einstein in 1915 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-09 11:20 -0700
Re: Einstein in 1915 nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-10-09 21:45 +0200
Re: Einstein in 1915 Gay Banana <rb@vedir.ru> - 2026-10-09 20:20 +0000
Re: Einstein in 1915 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-09 17:09 -0700
Re: Einstein in 1915 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-10 09:56 -0700
Re: Einstein in 1915 Gay Banana <rymi@ekrer.ru> - 2026-10-10 17:01 +0000
Re: Einstein in 1915 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-10 14:30 -0700
Re: Einstein in 1915 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-11 15:34 -0700
Re: Einstein in 1915 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-11 20:46 -0700
Re: Einstein in 1915 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-11 21:46 -0700
Re: Einstein in 1915 Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-10-10 07:15 +0200
Re: Einstein in 1915 Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-09 22:22 -0700
Re: Einstein in 1915 Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-09 22:23 -0700
Re: Einstein in 1915 Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-10-10 12:55 +0200
Re: Einstein in 1915 Gay Banana <eoowkn@jvnoa.ru> - 2026-10-10 15:36 +0000
Re: Einstein in 1915 Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-10 08:44 -0700
Re: Einstein in 1915 Jesee Beiman <emna@ijbbme.ru> - 2026-10-10 16:33 +0000
Re: Einstein in 1915 Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-10 09:39 -0700
Re: Einstein in 1915 Gay Banana <obpno@lnrccic.ru> - 2026-10-10 16:42 +0000
Re: Einstein in 1915 Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-10 09:57 -0700
Re: Einstein in 1915 Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-10 10:05 -0700
Re: Einstein in 1915 Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-12 07:50 -0700
Re: Einstein in 1915 x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-10-12 09:50 -0700
Re: Einstein in 1915 Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-10-12 19:06 +0200
Re: Einstein in 1915 Christal Bawidov <riwbd@ahiiwh.ru> - 2026-10-12 20:07 +0000
csiph-web