Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #674248

Re: Super Intelligence

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english, rec.arts.tv
Subject Re: Super Intelligence
Date 2026-10-07 18:08 -0700
Organization The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID <6AC6ED0C.73E2@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <tPvxS.406$SBg4.306@fx09.ams4> <6AC6A495.6BD8@ix.netcom.com> <TPxxS.10455$AQqd.2783@fx11.ams4> <6AC6CFD5.DE8@ix.netcom.com> <IGAxS.568$SBg4.115@fx09.ams4>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote:
> 
> On 10/8/2026 7:03 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote:
> >> On 10/8/2026 3:59 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote:
> >>>> On 10/7/2026 11:15 PM, occam wrote:
> >>>>> On 02/10/2026 22:51, Bob wrote:
> >>>>>> occam<occam@nowhere.nix> writes:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> <snip>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> The funny thing is, it does not seem to get us anywhere. Do you think it
> >>>>>> will, well, get us anywhere, well, good?
> >>>>> It already has. There are plenty of positive contributions of AI around.
> >>>>> <https://cacm.acm.org/news/scientific-applications-of-generative-ai/>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If you want more specifics, look at AlfaFold 2.
> >>>>> "Demis Hassabis was awarded the Nobel Prize for his groundbreaking work
> >>>>> in protein structure prediction. This research utilized artificial
> >>>>> intelligence models, particularly AlphaFold2, to predict the complex
> >>>>> structures of proteins, which are essential for understanding biological
> >>>>> processes."
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The reason for your exasperation is that most of the journalistic
> >>>>> coverage you read about is the negative stuff; fake videos & photos;
> >>>>> made up scientific papers with fake references; Fake news; etc.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The good stuff takes longer to develop. And it is not very sensational.
> >>>>> The reason why most journalist like to criticize  AI is because they
> >>>>> feel threatened by it. AI is capable of doing what they do - only
> >>>>> better, quicker and cheaper.
> >>>> So, what happens if I want to do something the A.I. cannot do?  How do I
> >>>> go about that in the first place?
> >>>
> >>> For example????
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> you wanna make a baby with an Ai?
> >>>
> >> You don't know how to do something the A.I. cannot?  I mean, it's not
> >> hard to find the gaps in its knowledege.  My go-to problem is /trans-
> >> actional file system/.
> >>
> >> Ask the A.I. to make one for you.  You'll quickly find the gaps, and
> >> will have to teach it the details.  Which is a waste of time, because
> >> it forgets everything as soon as its window of context is too large.
> >>
> >> Best wishes, and happy doing something the A.I. cannot!
> > I don't know what is a "transactional file system"..
> >
> > but I know of things Ai cannot do because it simply has not learned it
> > yet, that's
> > where you come in and 'train it' yourself.
> 
> Seems you claim you're an NTFS "expert" and didn't know about this?
> 

Ok, I'll repeat again in English...

I wrote:

"I don't know what is a "transactional file system".."
"I don't know what is a "transactional file system".."
"I don't know what is a "transactional file system".."


but I know of things Ai cannot do because 
it simply has not learned it yet, that's
where you come in and *train it* 'yourself'.

 *train it* 'yourself'.
 *train it* 'yourself'.



First collect links (books, pdf's) either from the internet or
 your own documents, and
Upload it to Ai.

and
Upload it to Ai.

and
Upload it to Ai.

and don't forget to
Upload it to Ai.

It will read it all, and then tell Ai ...


---------------------begins here-------------------------------

PROMPT:
Role: You are a knowledgeable expert on the topic below.

Task: Role: You are a knowledgeable Transactional expert

------------------------------ends here-------------------- 


https://www.google.com/search?q=PROMPT%3A+Role%3A+You+are+a+knowledgeable+Transactional+expert



'wats wes gots heres is a failure to communicate'









-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-29 19:11 -0700
  Re: Super Intelligence guido wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-09-30 10:14 +0200
    Re: Super Intelligence Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-09-30 18:37 +1000
      Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-30 13:34 -0700
      Re: Super Intelligence occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-10-01 20:07 +0200
        Re: Super Intelligence Bob <usenet@bananacorp.nl.invalid> - 2026-10-02 20:51 +0000
          Re: Super Intelligence occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-10-07 17:15 +0200
            Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-08 02:03 +0800
              Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-07 12:59 -0700
                Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-08 04:20 +0800
                Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-07 16:03 -0700
                Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-08 07:35 +0800
                Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-07 18:08 -0700
                Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-08 10:01 +0800
              Re: Super Intelligence occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-10-08 09:02 +0200
                Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-08 21:11 +0800
                Re: Super Intelligence Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2026-10-08 17:29 +0200
                Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-08 10:38 -0700
                Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-09 04:37 +0800
                Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-08 16:26 -0700
                Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-09 09:39 +0800
                Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-18 12:30 -0700
                Re: Super Intelligence Blaine <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-10-18 16:17 -0600
                Re: Super Intelligence Titus G <noone@nowhere.com> - 2026-10-19 11:26 +1300
                Re: Super Intelligence Blaine <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-10-18 16:49 -0600
                Re: Super Intelligence Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-10-09 10:49 +1100
                Re: Super Intelligence Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-08 17:17 -0700
                Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-09 09:39 +0800
                Re: Super Intelligence Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-08 19:02 -0700
                Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-08 20:12 -0700
                Re: Super Intelligence Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2026-10-09 09:27 +1300
                Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-08 20:16 -0700
                Re: Super Intelligence Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-10-09 10:29 +1100
                Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-08 20:22 -0700
              Re: Super Intelligence squalk <sq@net.invalid> - 2026-10-08 20:17 +0100
                Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-09 04:43 +0800
                Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-08 20:26 -0700
            Re: Super Intelligence Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2026-10-08 11:00 +1300
    Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-30 13:30 -0700
    Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-01 22:22 -0700
      Re: Super Intelligence HenryWilson <Hgw@home.com> - 2026-10-02 12:07 +0000
    Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-01 22:26 -0700
      Re: Super Intelligence "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-10-02 15:56 +0200
        Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-03 12:47 -0700
    Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-01 22:27 -0700
    Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-01 22:30 -0700
      Re: Super Intelligence wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-10-02 11:37 +0200
        Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-02 22:57 +0800
        Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-03 12:53 -0700
  Re: Super Intelligence Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> - 2026-10-07 02:55 -0400
    Re: Super Intelligence Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-10-08 02:08 +0800
      Re: Super Intelligence wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-10-07 23:04 +0200
        Re: Super Intelligence The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-08 20:32 -0700

csiph-web