Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #674193
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: What are perfect clocks |
| Date | Mon, 05 Oct 2026 10:38:39 -0700 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Lines | 41 |
| Message-ID | <6AC3E09F.67B9@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | <18db594c631dcc72$98574$908382$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <6AC29A0D.7F7D@ix.netcom.com> <18db682fb376c852$96762$900885$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <6AC2B0BD.2D8B@ix.netcom.com> <18db8993fd7aa85e$121486$867271$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> |
| Reply-To | starmaker@ix.netcom.com |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Mon, 05 Oct 2026 17:38:33 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | dont-email.me; logging-data="1242923"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX199x7uuC0ZNOSZPGt8Wgyo1TPJ5nYmSoZo="; posting-host="f04fcca525b2e9c6a9ac8a830030d9e0" |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:Nl4qmD2FatOmj1uDVemUOV0CUL8= sha256:XCB4eXldk/xRi0xfhQ5jvJpIb+b64rcxAmFyGpWGj5M= sha1:euwtDbb812NifRecZBMUOWp67Gc= sha256:Lfs7cTeqifn0rJe6+qV28C4mB01OWrokkyoJxcnYsbw= |
| X-Antivirus | Avast (VPS 261005-0, 10/04/2026), Outbound message |
| X-Antivirus-Status | Clean |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:674193 |
Show key headers only | View raw
=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Wo=C5=BAniak?= wrote: > > On 10/4/2026 10:02 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > =?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Wo=C5=BAniak?= wrote: > >> > >> On 10/4/2026 8:25 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>> A perfect clock would be the universal clock. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> Perfect is relative. Fir The Shit > >> woeshipers perfect clocks are the clocks > >> fitting their idiocies, of cours (and, > >> apart of that - measuring what they measure, > >> as their definition states). > >> > >> For sane people perfect clocks are > >> synchronized clocks (that's not a > >> definition, but a necessary condition). > >> > >> So were they for pre-einsteinian > >> physicists - seems they were mostly > >> sane, even with this mystical mumbo > >> jumbo their moronic religion is adding > >> to everything it can't comprehend. > > > > I was refering to Newton's clock: > > > > It continues ticking along, as a perfect machine, with its gears > > governed by the laws of physics, > > Mystical magic, as expected from a physicist. i didn't know Newton's motion of the planets was...Mystical. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What are perfect clocks Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-10-04 16:17 +0200
Re: What are perfect clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-04 11:25 -0700
Re: What are perfect clocks Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-10-04 20:50 +0200
Re: What are perfect clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-04 13:02 -0700
Re: What are perfect clocks Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-10-05 07:02 +0200
Re: What are perfect clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-05 10:38 -0700
Re: What are perfect clocks Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-10-06 06:49 +0200
Re: What are perfect clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-05 22:15 -0700
Re: What are perfect clocks Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-10-06 08:19 +0200
Re: What are perfect clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-06 20:18 -0700
Re: What are perfect clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-07 00:24 -0700
csiph-web