Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #674159

Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not.

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity, sci.math
Subject	Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not.
Date	Sat, 03 Oct 2026 22:53:41 -0700
Organization	The Starmaker Organization
Lines	30
Message-ID	<6AC1E9E5.45C1@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References	<wgJsKWn1UocHEgvuD71xcEf4x0o@jntp> <6ABD733A.146@ix.netcom.com> <18dab53395caa200$845$16561$4256dc03@news.newsgroupdirect.com> <1s2cwrz.ixdybeuv11fdN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <18db1d209cb68d2c$11318$16561$4256dc03@news.newsgroupdirect.com> <1s2fc1z.13u3ytv1htr0zdN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <119rskq$hmdm$1@news.nntp4.net>
Reply-To	starmaker@ix.netcom.com
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Injection-Date	Sun, 04 Oct 2026 05:53:36 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	dont-email.me; logging-data="3832348"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/8rygn4G6jn7qREBJAQ7FdICwdNVD5nUA="; posting-host="5fbf0bb8224ee729fba270fdec923b5a"
Cancel-Lock	sha1:KKg24k1iDX6sU+Xnf8VipTW+Pc0= sha256:BQH+rGlLv7Bp4LCodBFhrZSaXTb/jsrCQhfurSfOXAw= sha1:BMxsnsW4Z3s3P8SRD1gwrlLypIU= sha256:FXrunbWKinPQx102vHIb3LYGRRxRguGDmaxHWSixhaY=
X-Antivirus	Avast (VPS 261003-4, 10/03/2026), Outbound message
X-Mailer	Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
X-Antivirus-Status	Clean
Xref	csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:674159 sci.math:647856

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Ken Tulohonov wrote:
> 
> J. J. Lodder wrote:
> 
> >> >> 1000 years ago, the pope ruled that mentioning the number zero was a
> >> >> serious crime.
> >> >
> >> > Source for this papal rule?
> >>
> >> Wikipedia...'history of number' I think...or maybe the 'history of
> >> money'
> >> or astronomy. It is there somewhere.
> >
> > OK, no source, just loose talk,
> 
> not sure the Natural numbers includes zero, but the Roman numbers does
> not. No

There are no natural numbers since numbers don't exist out there
naturally.

Numbers are simply what one reads into, not out of.




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Thread

BEING exists, Nothingness does not. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2026-09-30 01:55 +0000
  Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not. Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2026-09-30 07:52 +0000
  Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-09-30 10:40 +0200
  Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-30 13:38 -0700
    Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not. HenryWilson <Hgw@home.com> - 2026-10-02 12:10 +0000
      Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-10-02 23:03 +0200
        Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not. HenryWilson <Hgw@home.com> - 2026-10-03 19:55 +0000
          Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-10-03 22:52 +0200
            Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not. Ken Tulohonov <onvn@onotlvt.ru> - 2026-10-03 21:38 +0000
              Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-03 22:53 -0700
                Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-03 23:11 -0700
                Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-04 00:40 -0700
                Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not. HenryWilson <Hgw@home.com> - 2026-10-04 11:13 +0000
                Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-04 09:55 -0700
                Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-04 11:27 -0700
                Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not. Dennie Duronov <urnd@rnd.ru> - 2026-10-04 21:08 +0000
                Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-10-05 10:48 -0700
                Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not. Niarcos Veselkov <avor@rooso.ru> - 2026-10-06 16:46 +0000
              Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-10-04 14:03 +0200
                Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not. Ambrose Bazanov <an@mao.ru> - 2026-10-04 21:04 +0000
                Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-10-05 19:44 +0200
                Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-05 14:35 -0700
            Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not. HenryWilson <Hgw@home.com> - 2026-10-04 11:04 +0000
              Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-10-04 17:58 +0200
                Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not. HenryWilson <Hgw@home.com> - 2026-10-05 08:59 +0000
                Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-10-05 13:53 +0200
                Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-05 07:53 -0700
                Re: BEING exists, Nothingness does not. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-10-05 09:46 -0700

csiph-web