Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #673794
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!wilderland.ovh!ereborbbs.duckdns.org!eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Why can one not define the frequency of light? (was: Why Can't an Einstein Fan Define Light's 'Frequency'?) |
| Date | Sat, 26 Sep 2026 09:23:28 -0700 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Lines | 27 |
| Message-ID | <6AB7F180.4D21@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | <18d88e958a7a1cbb$7390$2272267$4296dcc3@news.newsgroupdirect.com> <1198agn$121bj$1@gwaiyur.mb-net.net> |
| Reply-To | starmaker@ix.netcom.com |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Sat, 26 Sep 2026 16:23:27 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | dont-email.me; logging-data="659737"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/CUsNM5Mdj3R6yUo3Jnq2zmeeuRzDpdYs="; posting-host="ed6f7b3aff26cdc71f3d17d45ac05e49" |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:tn1bcNaAimytyDJFRpqaz2KeFuI= sha256:PJeKfY7F/S5fJwnOHyNcJ0lvzSpmYWBTj/xTiHj46mc= sha1:qY6Y80BhjJlcUUi9Zw6chtxdW/c= sha256:/7MKnV/0VTjmBTecMrrooOeymVNuu5tEonEmSec2F40= |
| X-Antivirus-Status | Clean |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) |
| X-Antivirus | Avast (VPS 260925-4, 09/25/2026), Outbound message |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:673794 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > > HenryWilson wrote: > > [Why can one not define the frequency of light?] > Because light is more complicated than you think, and probably are able > to understand. If you had watched the videos in the playlist that I > referred you to, you would have already known. > > And BTW, that has nothing to do with being an "Einstein fan". "videos"??? which Star Trek episode are you referring to? 750 terahertz? > > -- > PointedEars > > Twitter: @PointedEars2 > Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why Can't an Einstein Fan Define Light's 'Frequency'? HenryWilson <Hgw@home.com> - 2026-09-25 12:00 +0000
Re: Why Can't an Einstein Fan Define Light's 'Frequency'? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-25 11:09 -0700
Re: Why Can't an Einstein Fan Define Light's 'Frequency'? HenryWilson <Hgw@home.com> - 2026-09-26 10:16 +0000
Re: Why Can't an Einstein Fan Define Light's 'Frequency'? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-26 09:02 -0700
Why can one not define the frequency of light? (was: Why Can't an Einstein Fan Define Light's 'Frequency'?) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-09-26 13:32 +0200
Re: Why can one not define the frequency of light? (was: Why Can't an Einstein Fan Define Light's 'Frequency'?) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-26 09:23 -0700
Re: Why Can't an Einstein Fan Define Light's 'Frequency'? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-09-26 22:13 +0200
Re: Why Can't an Einstein Fan Define Light's 'Frequency'? HenryWilson <Hgw@home.com> - 2026-09-27 09:19 +0000
csiph-web