Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #673762
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!wilderland.ovh!ereborbbs.duckdns.org!eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Why Can't an Einstein Fan Define Light's 'Frequency'? |
| Date | Fri, 25 Sep 2026 11:09:25 -0700 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Lines | 30 |
| Message-ID | <6AB6B8D4.6A13@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | <18d88e958a7a1cbb$7390$2272267$4296dcc3@news.newsgroupdirect.com> |
| Reply-To | starmaker@ix.netcom.com |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Fri, 25 Sep 2026 18:09:15 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | dont-email.me; logging-data="4023838"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19lOoRlnEu9L9d92GrnOZC2oDGeAhjdTbg="; posting-host="2bf5f15182b49403b75c49eadb005321" |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:nVsgajlfZ2Cp6UC7zly2z3XkGFI= sha256:/dTRvbwq0Fnb3wz1vEHeYnCJOPKXAdQehjGqPBlEDf8= sha1:2/R3zYe9LXOMuRUzmrVsC3kHJJA= sha256:+T7eo9hEGp4aFKThoO22ko1blW3ZAqMiE5VwRaV3e+I= |
| X-Antivirus | Avast (VPS 260925-2, 09/25/2026), Outbound message |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) |
| X-Antivirus-Status | Clean |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:673762 |
Show key headers only | View raw
HenryWilson wrote: > > After all, it is arguably the most important quantity not just for > supporting Einstein but also for the whole of modern Physics...and > apparently, it doesn't even exist. Well, there are a lot of "Einstein fans" who know nothing about Einstein physics. They just like to put a poster of Einstien on their wall..makes them look smarter. Or an Einstein t-shirt. Those are fans. You must mean "Einsteinian Fans"...meaning related to einstein physics, not t-shirts fans. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why Can't an Einstein Fan Define Light's 'Frequency'? HenryWilson <Hgw@home.com> - 2026-09-25 12:00 +0000
Re: Why Can't an Einstein Fan Define Light's 'Frequency'? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-25 11:09 -0700
Re: Why Can't an Einstein Fan Define Light's 'Frequency'? HenryWilson <Hgw@home.com> - 2026-09-26 10:16 +0000
Re: Why Can't an Einstein Fan Define Light's 'Frequency'? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-26 09:02 -0700
Why can one not define the frequency of light? (was: Why Can't an Einstein Fan Define Light's 'Frequency'?) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-09-26 13:32 +0200
Re: Why can one not define the frequency of light? (was: Why Can't an Einstein Fan Define Light's 'Frequency'?) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-09-26 09:23 -0700
Re: Why Can't an Einstein Fan Define Light's 'Frequency'? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-09-26 22:13 +0200
Re: Why Can't an Einstein Fan Define Light's 'Frequency'? HenryWilson <Hgw@home.com> - 2026-09-27 09:19 +0000
csiph-web