Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #466998
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-05 15:40 -0700 |
| References | (17 earlier) <001ea572-b573-1534-27b6-bf419def0117@PointedEars.de> <ccc07635-5789-431c-aed2-614359d4f6b5@googlegroups.com> <07b5b3bc-9656-5de7-557a-33724b69cc50@PointedEars.de> <734cd2ca-6f88-46ff-8022-de4d728d6001@googlegroups.com> <39493da9-3019-cc34-edd6-9421ed0dafd2@PointedEars.de> |
| Message-ID | <67feefff-a631-486c-b997-05919b736f38@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: What is a particle? |
| From | mitchrae3323@gmail.com |
On Sunday, August 5, 2018 at 4:02:55 AM UTC-7, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote: > > On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 6:29:08 PM UTC-7, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > >> mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote: > >>> On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 5:16:20 AM UTC-7, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > >>>> mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote: > >>>>> Light is not a particle. > >>>> It consists of particles, which are quantum objects, called “photons”. > >>> Why did Einstein detract from his 1921 Nobel photon in 1937? > >> Pardon? > > > > Pardoning ignorance is uncalled for... > > “(I beg your) pardon?” is not request for pardon, but an English idiom of > politeness meaning “I did not understand (why you said) what you just said. > Please explain what you mean.” > > >>> It is just a wave oscillating. > >> No. > > > > It is not a standing wave. > > A photon is not a wave in the classical sense at all. > > >>> Protons are particles, electrons are particles and when they combine > >>> there is a new particle... > >> Yes. > > > > You don't need quarks particles for those fundamentals > > protons and electron make the neutron not quarks. > > But one does. The reaction of electron capture that you are referring to is > superficially > > p⁺ + e⁻ → n⁰ + ν_e. > > But, actually, protons and neutrons are both hadrons and baryons – > *composite* particles: they do NOT interact with leptons like electrons > directly. > > Instead, an intermediary W-boson communicates the weak interaction between > a quark and a lepton; in this case, when an up-quark of the proton > spontaneously changes flavor into a down-quark (the third component of the > particle’s weak isospin I₃ changes from +½ to −½): > > uud → udd + W⁺ > e⁻ + W⁺ → ν_e > __ > udd ,'| ν_e > ^^^ W⁺ ,' > \\\ _ .->.__ > \\\,' '-' /`. > /// `. > /// ` e⁻ > /// __ > udu |PE > > and > > e⁻ → W⁻ + ν_e > uud + W⁻ → udd > > udd > ^^^ __ > \\\ W⁻ .| ν_e > \\\<-. _ .' > /// `-' '.'_ __ > /// /`. |PE > /// `. > udu ` e⁻ > > A hadron/baryon with two up-quarks and one down-quark is a proton. > A hadron/baryon with one up-quark and two down-quarks is a neutron. > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction> > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction#Charged-current_interaction> > <http://www.lppp.lancs.ac.uk/higgs/pop-ups/feynman.html> > > >>>>> It can be a wave point. > >>>> No. > >>> When it is stored it is a wave point. > >> No. You have no clue. > > > > If you are against a light point when stored with > > point particles why do you believe the photon? > > Your question is so confused that one cannot tell whether > the thought behind it, if any, is nonsense. Learn English first. > > -- > PointedEars > > Twitter: @PointedEars2 > Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail. Imbecile PE. Einstein turned away from his Nobel photon in 1937 for what he said "light is a spherical wavelet." He could no longer reconcile the particle of light with the light spherical wavelet. Einstein has been proven the winner of the historical argument against quantum mechanics. Mitchell Raemsch
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: What is a particle? Wayne Dial <ulau@dvbpdn.dv> - 2018-07-29 19:42 +0000
Re: What is a particle? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-29 13:01 -0700
Re: What is a particle? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-07-30 17:04 +0000
Re: What is a particle? Wayne Dial <ulau@dvbpdn.dv> - 2018-07-30 19:15 +0000
Re: What is a particle? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-31 17:35 -0700
Re: What is a particle? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-01 11:32 -0700
Re: What is a particle? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-02 01:40 +0200
Re: What is a particle? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-08-01 21:27 -0700
Re: What is a particle? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-04 14:16 +0200
Re: What is a particle? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-08-04 17:23 -0700
Re: What is a particle? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-05 03:29 +0200
Re: What is a particle? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-08-04 22:05 -0700
Re: What is a particle? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-05 13:02 +0200
Re: What is a particle? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-08-05 15:40 -0700
Re: What is a particle? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-08-05 15:43 -0700
Re: What is a particle? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-04 10:45 -0700
Re: What is a particle? Owen Scharff <nehh@fenohw.ho> - 2018-08-06 12:00 +0000
Re: What is a particle? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-08-06 12:23 -0700
Re: What is a particle? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-06 15:33 -0700
Re: What is a particle? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-08-06 19:49 -0700
Re: What is a particle? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-07 09:11 -0700
csiph-web