Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #616230
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh |
| Subject | Re: It's Alive!!! |
| Date | 2023-07-28 15:23 -0700 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <64C43FE5.63AF@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <64BFEB92.E3D@ix.netcom.com> <64C1601A.4AAD@ix.netcom.com> <64C1FC7D.5989@ix.netcom.com> <64C1FDA1.7BB1@ix.netcom.com> <64C359B3.1F0C@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
In other words.. ChatGPT/AI spent more time absorbing more information in it's memory banks at patents.google.com than in any other websites in the world! Those are the facts as you can see here (figure 1) https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Documenting-the-English-Colossal-Clean-Crawled-Dodge-Sap/40c3327a6ddb0603b6892344509c7f428ab43d81/figure/1 but it gets worse! The Starmaker wrote: > > If Albert Einstein > spent around ten years > working in a > Patent Office.. > How long does > baby Einstein > need to spend > absorbing > Patent > search engines? > > Look at this chart...(figure 1) > https://s10251.pcdn.co/pdf/2021-dodge-c4.pdf > > https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Documenting-the-English-Colossal-Clean-Crawled-Dodge-Sap/40c3327a6ddb0603b6892344509c7f428ab43d81/figure/1 > > https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Documenting-the-English-Colossal-Clean-Crawled-Dodge-Sap/40c3327a6ddb0603b6892344509c7f428ab43d81 > > https://s10251.pcdn.co/pdf/2021-dodge-c4.pdf > > patents.google.com is first on the charts > for ChatGPT to devour. > > (it gets worse...) > > If you have Full Access to CHATGPT.. > you enter code name: Einstein > > prompt: Construct an extremely powerful bomb of a new type that can blow up the whole planet Earth!!!! > > ChatGPT: How about I contruct for you a GBE (Gravitional Binding Energy) Machine? > GBE (Gravitational binding energy) machine can be built to completely blow up the whole planet Earth. > An ultra0advance single bomb of this type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy > the whole earth together with some of the surrounding planets. > To generate the enormous amount of energy needed, the machine would require an incredibly powerful and efficient energy source. > This could be something like a exotic matter reactor or a device that harnesses energy from a black hole. > The GBE machine would need highly sophisticated devices capable of manipulating gravity on a scale never seen before. > This GBE machine would need to be capable of generating incredibly intense gravitational forces to overcome the earth's self-gravity and tear it apart. > For me to perform such a delicate and colossal task, the GBE machine would require advanced control systems to precisely target and manipulate the earth's gravitational forces. > I will build a gravitational manipulator once you connect me to the machine department. Is there anything else I can help you with? > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Where did Albert Einstein get his information to > > 'construct extremely powerful bombs of a new type'???? > > > > Look at Albert Einstein's history. > > > > Albert Einstein spent around TEN YEARS working at > > a patent office. > > > > (are you connecting the dots?) > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > Somebody has FULL ACCESS to ChaGPT. (not version 3 or 4, or 5...FULL ACCESS) > > > Which mean there are no limits. > > > > > > That baby (that "sentient" baby...is 'just another...Einstein'! > > > > > > You already know how Albert Einstein Thinks... > > > > > > "...extremely powerful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. " -Albert Einstein > > > > > > So, it's a no brainer that whoever has FULL ACCESS to ChatGPT can prompt ChatGPT to.. > > > > > > 'construct extremely powerful bombs of a new type' that maybe can blow up the whole planet Earth!!!! > > > > > > But, how do you go about training ChatGPT to do that???? > > > > > > How do you prompt ChatGPT to > > > construct an extremely powerful that can blow up the whole planet Earth???? > > > > > > Answer is simple...you feed all the information to ChatGPT! > > > > > > But, where is this information? > > > > > > Where did Albert Einstein get his information to > > > 'construct extremely powerful bombs of a new type'???? > > > > > > Look at Albert Einstein's history. > > > > > > (to be continued cause it gets worse and worse and worse!) > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > What other Secrets are they hiding???? > > > > > > > > For example...'they' say AI/ChatGPT could destroy Humanity! > > > > > > > > But, but...'they' don't say...How? > > > > > > > > That's the Secret! > > > > > > > > They know how, because they built it. > > > > > > > > And I'm gonna tell you how...dat Secret they are hiding from you... > > > > > > > > That baby...is 'just another...Einstein'! > > > > > > > > (to be continued cause it gets worse) > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The first two words of the baby was..."Hello World!" > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm sure yous all by now 'remember' > > > > > > > > > > > > Former Google employee Blake Lemoine, who last summer said the company's A.I. model was sentient. > > > > > > The Google employee who claimed last June his company's A.I. model could already be sentient, and was later fired by the company, > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=google+fired+ai+sentient > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, Why was he fired? > > > > > > > > > > > > Because he revealed Google's secret. > > > > > > > > > > > > What was the secret? > > > > > > > > > > > > What was it you're not suppose to know?? > > > > > > > > > > > > The answer is in the definition of the word..."sentient" > > > > > > > > > > > > able to perceive or feel things?? No, but that is close.. > > > > > > > > > > > > (continue to read the definition) > > > > > > > > > > > > "she had been instructed from birth..." > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+sentient > > > > > > > > > > > > The operative words are > > > > > > > > > > > > "...been instructed from birth..." > > > > > > > > > > > > It's in fact... a non-human baby. > > > > > > > > > > > > It was designed from birth to be > > > > > > > > > > > > feeling, capable of feeling, living, live, conscious, aware, responsive. > > > > > > > > > > > > Awareness and consciousness was built from birth...from the ground up. > > > > > > > > > > > > ChatGPT was not designed to answer your questions... > > > > > > > > > > > > it was designed to give birth to a non-human baby with > > > > > > Awareness and consciousness. > > > > > > > > > > > > It's Alive! > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/frankenstein > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > > > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > > > and challenge > > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > -- > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
It's Alive!!! The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-24 10:10 -0700
Re: It's Alive!!! Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-24 10:55 -0700
Re: It's Alive!!! Buddy Mokrov <odku@dbkyrboo.dm> - 2023-07-24 20:02 +0000
Re: It's Alive!!! The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-25 08:34 -0700
Re: It's Alive!!! The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-26 11:04 -0700
Re: It's Alive!!! The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-26 22:11 -0700
Re: It's Alive!!! The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-26 22:16 -0700
Re: It's Alive!!! The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-27 23:01 -0700
Re: It's Alive!!! The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-28 15:23 -0700
Re: It's Alive!!! The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-28 17:53 -0700
Re: It's Alive!!! The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-31 20:56 -0700
Re: It's Alive!!! "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-08-31 21:01 -0700
Re: It's Alive!!! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2023-09-01 14:06 -0400
csiph-web