Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #613076

Re: Part II: How Einstein cooked the paper that made him famous worldwide

Show key headers only | View raw

JanPB wrote:
> 
> On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 2:34:55 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 8:24:38 PM UTC-3, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > This OP addresses how Einstein cooked the GR equation for vacuum, which
> > > allowed him to reach to a desired form of his equation 11:
> > >
> > > (11) (dx/dφ)² = 2A/B² + α/B² x −x² + αx³
> > >
> > > at which he introduces his fix with the cubic term, being α the Schwarzschild radius. A is the energy of the system and B is the angular moment, both being
> > > constants because they are conserved values in orbital dynamics of planets.
> > >
> > > The previous equation before replacing x = 1/r didn't appear in the paper, but is
> > >
> > > (1/r² dr/dφ)² = 2A/B² + (2GMm²/L²) 1/r - 1/r² + (2MG/c²) 1/r³
> > >
> > > where I reintroduced the physical values of G, M, c and m for clarity. I'll
> > > continue with geometrical units (all of them made equal to 1).
> > >
> > > This equation is derived from the general newtonian expression for orbital
> > > dynamics in polar coordinates, around the equator of the Sun (Planetary
> > > Motion part on his paper):
> > >
> > > (Equations 8, 8a) 1/2 u² + ɸ = A ; u² = dr²/ds² + r² (dφ/ds)² ; r² dφ/ds = B
> > >
> > > Cheat 1: Even when he resigned to analyze the motion u(Ï„) of Mercury by
> > > only accounting time in period T units, he didn't get rid of τ , as he uses s= cτ.
> > >
> > > Cheat 2: He resigned the entire concept of relativity by assuming Ï„ = t,
> > > what will give his equations the value of absolute time and absolute space
> > > as the system being centered on (0,0,0) xyz coordinates and measured
> > > from Earth, in order to match data from observational astronomy of that
> > > epoch, without considering the speed of light and the delays.
> > >
> > > In equation 8a, he introduces the gravitational potential as ɸ = - α/2r,
> > > which is used to disguise the fact that α = 2MG/c² (Schwarzschild radius)
> > > has been introduced in the beginning, hence the 1/2 factor.
> > >
> > > Then, the equation for orbital dynamics is PURELY newtonian.
> > >
> > > As r² (dφ/ds)² = B²/r², then the equation 1/2 u² + ɸ = A can be written as:
> > >
> > > u(τ)² = 2A - 2ɸ
> > >
> > > Cheat 3: He knows that the above equation is pure newtonian and is not
> > > bringing him anywhere. So he cheats by modifying his Eq. 8 and ɸ by:
> > >
> > > (Eq. 7c) ɸ = - α/2r (1 + B²/r²), so he can get the four terms of the polynomial.
> > >
> > > u(τ)² = 2A - α/r - αB²/r³ , what allows
> > >
> > > dr²/ds² + r² (dφ/ds)² = 2A - α/r - αB²/r³ OR (remember r² (dφ/ds))
> > >
> > > dr²/ds² + r² (dφ/ds)² = 2A - α/r - αB²/r³ - B² (dφ/ds)
> > >
> > > As s = Ï„ (c = 1), he needs to get rid of time Ï„.
> > > In parallel, and going back to coordinates x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄, he manages to get
> > >
> > > (Eq. 9) dx₄/ds = 1 + α/r
> > >
> > > Einstein manages to reach Equation 7b, using 6c, 8, 9 and 10:
> > >
> > > d²xᵤ/ds² = -αxᵤ/r³ (1 - 2A + 3 B²/r²)
> > >
> > > Cheat 4: In the solution of this differential equation he find the term
> > > s√[(1 - 2A) and determine that is equal to s (probably because A << 1),
> > > but still a cheat because is mixing time with THE ENERGY of the system.
> > >
> > > Now, with the advantage of not having all the equations numbered, and
> > > confusingly numbering without a sequential order, he performs a QUANTUM LEAP
> > > from Equation 7c to the desired Equation 11, by replacing r with 1/x:
> > >
> > > And proudly claims:
> > >
> > > "One eliminates ds from this equation with the help of (10), and so
> > > obtains, in which one designates by x the magnitude 1/r:
> > >
> > > (11) (dx/dφ)² = 2A/B² + α/B² x −x² + αx³
> > >
> > > which equation distinguishes itself from the corresponding Newtonian theory only through the last member on the right side."
> > >
> > > As I have demonstrated in two previous thread with similar topic, the
> > > solution of this first order differential equation and his calculation for
> > > one orbit of Mercury, only renders a differential excess from 2Ï€:
> > >
> > > ε = 1.6734E-07 rad/ orbit (0.03435 arcsec/ orbit), which gives only
> > > 14.33” of arc/century (1/3 of the alleged 43”).
> > >
> > > But, still, this paper was celebrated by him as a triumph of HIS general
> > > theory of relativity. The deflection of light by 1.75", briefly mentioned in
> > > the paper, was "verified" by Eddington's expedition 3 years later.
> > >
> > > But this paper, on Nov.18, 1915 is what made him worldwide famous.
> > >
> > > NEVER, even 10 years after, did Einstein show the calculations that gave
> > > the 1.75" of star light deflection when passing by Sun's surface.
> > >
> > > Even when KNOWN ASTRONOMERS in the world reclaimed for the
> > > theoretical calculations, not a single one received a copy.
> > >
> > > Only the Einstein's ass kissers, in the years to come (and even today),
> > > would RECREATE THE CALCULATIONS but using the MODIFIED Schwarzschild metric, the one that Hilbert derived in 1917.
> > >
> > > Had ANYONE used the original 1916 Schwarzschild metric, WOULD NOT
> > > have get the 1.75" because the theory that Einstein and Schwarzschild
> > > was INCORRECT, as they didn't used the latest Hilbert's equations, which
> > > would be available for Einstein 1 WEEK after that day Nov. 18, 1915.
> > >
> > > Schwarzschild is not to blame here. Hilbert, one year after his death,
> > > HONORED Schwarzschild by naming the correct metric after him.
> > >
> > > The same metric that everyone uses for ANYTHING today (GPS, Mercury,
> > > black holes, whatever).
> > >
> > > This is the conclusion: Einstein committed fraud on this paper through
> > > and through, in the GR part and in the basic calculus part to solve (11).
> > I've read again the OP in this thread, and I find the explanations of the fraud (to plagiarize Gerber final formula) just brilliant.
> >
> > But negationism and out casting of detractors are the most important weapons that relativists have.
> >
> > Even Schwarzschild slapped Einstein on the subject of Mercury, in the paper where he developed HIS general solution for the challenge.
> 
> Idiocies, as always.
> 
> --
> Jan

maybe he should get a different hobby???? this hobby is too relaxing and
pleasurable outside of his regular occupation...he should try...serial
killing! 





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Part II: How Einstein cooked the paper that made him famous worldwide Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-16 14:34 -0700
  Re: Part II: How Einstein cooked the paper that made him famous worldwide JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-06-16 15:39 -0700
    Re: Part II: How Einstein cooked the paper that made him famous worldwide The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-16 20:43 -0700
    Re: Part II: How Einstein cooked the paper that made him famous worldwide Demetrios Laar <emmo@ratrileo.tt> - 2023-06-17 14:20 +0000

csiph-web