Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #475355

Re: atomic clocks

Path	csiph.com!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.netfront.net!.POSTED.108.219.229.47!not-for-mail
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: atomic clocks
Date	Sat, 20 Oct 2018 11:26:30 -0700
Organization	Netfront http://www.netfront.net/
Message-ID	<5BCB7356.4303@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References	<5BCB691D.4F1E@ix.netcom.com> <5BCB6BBD.1369@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To	starmaker@ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Injection-Info	adenine.netfront.net; posting-host="108.219.229.47"; logging-data="66951"; mail-complaints-to="news@netfront.net"
X-Mailer	Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
X-Antivirus	Avast (VPS 181020-8, 10/20/2018), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status	Clean
Xref	csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:475355

Show key headers only | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Atomic Clocks today...are not accurate.
> >
> > They are off...
> >
> > so any calculations
> >
> > based on your
> >
> > most accurate clock will be
> >
> > ...wrong.
> >
> > It will be off.
> >
> > It will always be wrong.
> 
> Lets put it this way...
> 
> you're not on the right track.
> 
> Don't forget..
> 
> you got a bunch of stupid people making, designing and building atomic clocks.
> 
> "Hey, go make me another clock!"
> 
> "What was wrong with the last one?"
> 
> "IT'S FUCKING OFF, YOU STUPID MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"


it's only off by a second...


"WELL FUCKIN FIX IT!"


"but, you don't understand...it keeps slipping."

Thread

atomic clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-10-20 10:42 -0700
  Re: atomic clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-10-20 10:54 -0700
    Re: atomic clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-10-20 11:26 -0700
  Re: atomic clocks rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-10-20 11:04 -0700

csiph-web