Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #428546
| Message-ID | <59909D97.1F47@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-13 11:42 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Page 19 from the book GRAVITATION |
| References | <79d7d435-f74b-4d95-9a12-4334fb92f661@googlegroups.com> <59909697.3A5A@ix.netcom.com> <d86534e4-41bb-4596-8906-6626704a3613@googlegroups.com> |
Nicolaas Vroom wrote: > > On Sunday, 13 August 2017 20:12:46 UTC+2, The Starmaker wrote: > > Nicolaas Vroom wrote: > > > > > > > > > In short page 19 underscores the importance of Newton in relation to > > > the movement of the planets and overestimates, in comparison, the > > > importance of Einstein. > > > What is even more important Einstein uses concepts which IMO makes > > > understanding of the issues more complex than it is. > > > For example if you want to understand the movement of the planets > > > you should discard (treat separately) everything that is related > > > towards light. Moving clocks should not de used. Reaction rates > > > should be handled with care. > > > > > > Nicolaas Vroom > > > http://users.pandora.be/nicvroom/GRAVITATION_page_19.htm > > > > > > > > albert einstein created SR at some point in time.. > > then for ten years later he studied Newton gravitation, and > > came up with GR. > > > > > > Ten years is a long time...between SR and GR. > > > > > > Einstein had to learn what is this thing called...Gravity. > > > > It took him ten years. > > > > You don't wake up knowing this stuff, ...you got to learn it. > > What is your point? > I have nothing against SR nor GR. > > The problem is you cannot compare SR with Newton's Law and then > claiming that Newton's Law is wrong (More or less) > > Nicolaas Vroom you wrote: > In part 4 SR is mentioned. The most important issue is that Newton is > not about SR but about GR. For Newton the issue is gravity. > For Einstein it is both SR and GR. That means if you want to compare > Einstein with Newton you should only compare, how each handles gravity > related issues. As such this page gives the wrong impression. maybe I got the wrong impression... but who would compare einstein's SR with Newton's GR??? Certaintly not me, then who?
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Page 19 from the book GRAVITATION Nicolaas Vroom <nicolaas.vroom@pandora.be> - 2017-08-13 05:27 -0700
Re: Page 19 from the book GRAVITATION Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2017-08-13 06:09 -0700
Re: Page 19 from the book GRAVITATION Nicolaas Vroom <nicolaas.vroom@pandora.be> - 2017-08-13 10:51 -0700
Re: Page 19 from the book GRAVITATION Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2017-08-13 15:20 -0700
Re: Page 19 from the book GRAVITATION Nicolaas Vroom <nicolaas.vroom@pandora.be> - 2017-08-16 06:07 -0700
Re: Page 19 from the book GRAVITATION Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2017-08-16 14:12 -0700
Re: Page 19 from the book GRAVITATION mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-08-16 23:32 -0700
Re: Page 19 from the book GRAVITATION The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-13 11:12 -0700
Re: Page 19 from the book GRAVITATION Nicolaas Vroom <nicolaas.vroom@pandora.be> - 2017-08-13 11:33 -0700
Re: Page 19 from the book GRAVITATION The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-13 11:42 -0700
csiph-web