Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #424551
| Path | csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Tue, 11 Jul 2017 16:57:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <596549B7.6BA8@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| Date | Tue, 11 Jul 2017 14:57:11 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Reply-To | starmaker@ix.netcom.com |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, rec.arts.sf.written, alt.astronomy |
| Subject | Re: The Alvarez hypothesis |
| References | <59615B14.5490@ix.netcom.com> <E5WdnQIyt_bAevzEnZ2dnUU78c_NnZ2d@supernews.com> <596278DC.4A8D@ix.netcom.com> <596287FE.10C7@ix.netcom.com> <ZtKdnaK-cP0dqv7EnZ2dnUU78XPNnZ2d@supernews.com> <5964430E.67D@ix.netcom.com> <51540183-26c8-495c-8338-265992b067e9@googlegroups.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Antivirus | Avast (VPS 170711-0, 07/10/2017), Outbound message |
| X-Antivirus-Status | Clean |
| Lines | 23 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 108.219.229.47 |
| X-Trace | sv3-AJsPUWDGKUDylOtFdiw4cXIEN0GYRsbT6lnJtNDKj+fK0Rl3sU/lohtfQNsSeMJVukuNMwTw/MbRG23!uIvQW/NhAMkQEC5WYvx6AfVdH0XK1vZFHjMVJweIMhiyVgxocHKTnI79bqbDEe1GIQQexx+uXZxh!0xcyVYsejVQ= |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 2004 |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics:640026 sci.physics.relativity:424551 rec.arts.sf.written:474682 alt.astronomy:292090 |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
Edward Prochak wrote: > > On Monday, July 10, 2017 at 11:15:59 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote: > [] > > > > There is nothing "brilliant" about his idea...he is like his > > father, they both created 'observations' that have > > 'never been observed'. > > Come back when you learn English. > "never before observed" is very different from "never observed" > > Ed Come back when you learn to READ English It READS: 'never been observed', NOT "never before observed" It means "NEVER NEVER OBSERVED" at any time! can you people believe the stupidity in these newgroups???
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-08 15:22 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-09 09:20 +0100
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-09 11:41 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-07-09 11:48 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-09 12:46 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-10 09:15 +0100
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-10 20:16 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-11 14:57 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-12 08:25 +0100
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-10 09:08 +0100
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-10 20:39 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-11 17:24 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-11 23:46 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-12 08:32 +0100
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-12 12:11 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-13 08:35 +0100
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-13 09:06 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-12 02:18 -0700
csiph-web