Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #422644

Re: our twin star

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Hägar wrote:
> 
> "The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:5942AFF8.3999@ix.netcom.com...
> 
> a new study reports that almost all sun-like stars are likely born with
> companions
> https://www.space.com/37186-sun-long-lost-twin-nemesis.html
> https://www.sciencealert.com/all-stars-might-be-born-with-a-twin-and-we-ve-called-ours-nemesis
> 
> Now, let me explain it all for yous...
> 
> You can look at the big dipper or little dipper
> and see the twin stars...and one of the twins...died.
> 
> Twin stars have a pipeline that transfer energy to each other. If
> the star drifts away...the pipeline is broken, and the star begins to die.
> 
> Twin stars are one positive and one negative.
> 
> Now, what hasn't been discovered yet (i'm waiting for a thousand years for
> you
> people to catch up with my genuies)
> 
> what hasn't been discovered yet ...is
> 
> every single person is a twin molded into one person.
> 
> That means, stars not also drift away, but they also meld into one.
> 
> So, those stupid people looking for our twin star ...some where else...
> need to look a little closer at our sun and they will find the twin.
> 
> (i give them another thousand years to find that out)
> 
> The Starmaker
> 
> ***boy oh boy ... you're right up there with treBert, that other
> manufacturer of putrid brain farts.  You two even misspell words
> the same way ... are you by any chance hanging onto delusions
> of a Nobel Prize, like your bro treBert???



Is there something you disagree with you need to point it out otherwise you have not a leg to stand on.


(but i don't subscribe to drive by shootings as yourself)

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 09:04 -0700
  Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-15 09:16 -0700
    Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 09:26 -0700
      Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-15 09:31 -0700
        Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-17 14:38 +0200
          Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-17 11:51 -0700
            Re: our twin star onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2017-06-17 21:33 +0100
            Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-17 22:34 +0200
              Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-17 17:46 -0700
        Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-17 10:20 -0700
          Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-17 10:30 -0700
      Re: our twin star "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2017-06-15 14:57 -0400
        Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 12:15 -0700
        Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 13:40 -0700
          Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-16 10:45 -0700
            Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-16 11:07 -0700
    Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-15 20:38 +0200
      Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 12:27 -0700
        Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-15 22:44 +0200
          Re: our twin star Kotovanich Nzerovu <ivhvruo@wovewvw.ev> - 2017-06-15 20:49 +0000
            Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-15 23:09 +0200
              Re: our twin star onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2017-06-16 13:56 +0100

csiph-web