Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #410838

Re: LIGO's Absolute Secrecy: Why?

Message-ID	<58B1C256.6100@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	2017-02-25 09:43 -0800
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: LIGO's Absolute Secrecy: Why?
References	<a3bd1810-ba1e-4c02-aad0-29baf34209e3@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Pentcho Valev wrote:
> 
> Physics has changed in strange ways. Theoreticians can now do without experimental confirmation while experimentalists find it ethical to work in absolute secrecy. Here is the latest news:
> 
> "Either way, Advanced LIGO could give us an additional test very soon, and it may have done so already - two events that are under analysis triggered an alert to other telescopes."
> 
> But this seems to be a remake or an improved version of the 2010 very secret story - then "a select few expert administrators" deceived everybody, misled astronomers into wasting time and money on the fake, and "this became particularly useful starting in September 2015":
> 
> https://www.researchgate.net/blog/post/a-null-result-is-not-a-failure
> 
> 
> In the changed physics world the following C.S.I. activity is regarded as a normal scientific procedure:
> 
> http://nautil.us/issue/34/adaptation/the-gravity-wave-hunter
> 
> 
> http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2016/04/black-hole-blues-gives-a-ringside-seat-to-discovery-of-gravitational-waves/
> 
> 
> So in 2010 LIGO conspirators still did not have "that sophisticated a criminal mind" and "screwed it up a little" but then they improved and in 2015 everything was just fine:
> 
> http://www.thenational.ae/arts-life/the-review/why-albert-einstein-continues-to-make-waves-as-black-holes-collide#full
> 
> 
> Pentcho Valev



“Ladies and gentlemen, we have detected gravitational waves,”


i bet they invented a machine that do just that...

Thread

LIGO's Absolute Secrecy: Why? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-25 09:32 -0800
  Re: LIGO's Absolute Secrecy: Why? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-02-25 09:43 -0800
    Re: LIGO's Absolute Secrecy: Why? "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-25 10:01 -0800
      Re: LIGO's Absolute Secrecy: Why? "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-25 10:03 -0800
    Re: LIGO's Absolute Secrecy: Why? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-02-25 10:08 -0800
  Re: LIGO's Absolute Secrecy: Why? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-25 12:39 -0800
    Re: LIGO's Absolute Secrecy: Why? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-26 02:04 -0800
      Re: LIGO's Absolute Secrecy: Why? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-28 08:39 -0800
  Re: LIGO's Absolute Secrecy: Why? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-09 22:39 +0200

csiph-web