Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #400802

Re: How Richard Feynman Confused Special Relativity

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Pentcho Valev wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Richard Feynman either did not understand special relativity or was deliberately confusing the audience:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_15.html
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The independence of the motion of the source by no means brings up the "interesting problem" where the dependence/independence of the motion of the observer is discussed. Maxwell's 19th century electromagnetic theory did indeed predict independence of the motion of the source for the speed of light but at the same time predicted dependence on the motion of the observer:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/papers/Chasing.pdf
> > > > >  John Norton: "That [Maxwell's] theory allows light to slow and be frozen in the frame of reference of a sufficiently rapidly moving observer."
> > > > >
> > > > > Feynman doesn't even mention the crucial fact that, originally (prior to FitzGerald and Lorentz advancing the ad hoc length contraction hypothesis), the Michelson-Morley experiment confirmed the Galilean transformation:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emission_theory
> > > > >  "Emission theory, also called emitter theory or ballistic theory of light, was a competing theory for the special theory of relativity, explaining the results of the Michelson–Morley experiment of 1887. [...] The name most often associated with emission theory is Isaac Newton. In his corpuscular theory Newton visualized light "corpuscles" being thrown off from hot bodies at a nominal speed of c with respect to the emitting object, and obeying the usual laws of Newtonian mechanics, and
> > > > >
> > > > > Feynman's explanation of the twin paradox, too, is very suspicious:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/blogs/physics/2015/04/physics-needs-philosophy/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Pentcho Valev
> > > >
> > > > Richard Feynman was mad at Albert Einstein for drafting him in
> > > > Einstein's war with Germany.
> > > >
> > > > Richard Feynman hates Albert Einstein with a vengence...
> > >
> > > ...and after the bomb was built, Albert Einsteins friends didn't want to
> > > talk with him anymore...
> >
> > I mean, come on really...did any friends of Albert Einstein EVER said anything nice aout Albert Einstein? Certaintly not Richard Feynman who he
> > hated Albert Einstein with a vengence...probably didn't agree with ANY of Einstein's theorires either!
> >
> 
> ...and of course, Richard Feynman blamed Albert Einstein for exposing him to the atomic bomb raidation which gave
> everyone  abdominal cancer...even Albert Einstein died from it as others like Ferni..
> 
> but yous don't know this stuff because you haven't read:
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html



Now, believe it or not...

there are people here that will insist that
yes, all those atomic scientist died of abdominal cancer except...
Albert Einstein..they will say Albert Einstein died of abdominal 'something else'.

Because, you're not allowed to say Albert Einstein died of abdominal cancer because
they stupidity insist he had nothing to do with the atomic bomb. They just want to
disassociate him with *any*thing to do with the atomic bomb.

It's not my problem that they are...stupid- or suckers.

Are you stupid too? Or are you just a sucker??

If you try and look up what Einstein died of...you'll find
"he had a problem with his stomach we're not sure what it was'

Now, did Albert Einstein bother to tell anybody that nucleaur raidation is...poisionous????

That it can kill you if you get near it?

Or, did he keep it a secret? 

http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: How Richard Feynman Confused Special Relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-04 16:47 -0800
  Re: How Richard Feynman Confused Special Relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-05 07:32 -0800

csiph-web