Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #399625

Re: FUCK The Laws of Physics, it works anyway..

Message-ID <5837361B.5AB7@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date 2016-11-24 10:48 -0800
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy
Subject Re: FUCK The Laws of Physics, it works anyway..
References <5835E90C.34B8@ix.netcom.com> <5835F872.68F1@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > FUCK The Laws of Physics, it works anyway..what NASA is really saying.
> >
> > https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2016/11/22/this-rocket-engine-breaks-a-law-of-physics-but-a-nasa-test-says-it-works-anyway/
> >
> > “EM drive,”?  Fake News..
> >
> > just more fraud for yous to eat up.
> >
> > NASA is tired of...science, they wanna go to Mars...or at least 'the money to go to Mars'...
> >
> > (it doesn't make any difference if they don't go, they just want the money)
> >
> > Or FUCK Mars, just give us the fuckin money already!!!
> >
> > Do you know the price of a VR headset??? and the wife wants a new house...
> >
> > The wife tells her NASA husband, "Get the fucking money, I don't give a fuck what you tell them!"
> 
> You have to understand...with NASA it's not about 'the laws of physics', or the 'laws of nature', it's about money.
> 
> If it disagrees with Nature...nature is wrong according to NASA.
> 
> In other words, NASA is saying "FUCK The Laws of Physics, FUCK nature...that science stuff is fucking with my money!
> 
> So, somebody tells the head guy at NASA, "What you want breaks the law of physics."
> 
> And NASA tells the guy, "GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE WITH LAWS OF PHYSICS, IF IT BRINGS IN THE MONEY, IT WORKS!"


you have to come from understanding...

NASA has always have a pattern of not dealing in...reality.


"Let us make recommendations to ensure that NASA officials deal in a
world of reality .."


"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over
public relations, for nature cannot be fooled."



Here is what NASA don't want you to know about them...
http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/51-l/docs/rogers-commission/Appendix-F.txt



Do you recommend that NASA deal in a
world of reality? 

Or is, fooling nature the only way NASA can survive?


Don't worry about rockets blowing up with people and teachers in them, there is more important things to be concerned about...


buying a new house for the misses.


The NASA husband tells his demanding wife.."I had to kill a few astronuts to get you this fuckin house!"

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

FUCK The Laws of Physics, it works anyway.. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-23 11:07 -0800
  FUCK The Laws of Physics, it works anyway.. "David (Lord Kronos) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-23 11:11 -0800
  FUCK The Laws of Physics, it works anyway.. "David (Lord Kronos) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-23 11:18 -0800
    FUCK The Laws of Physics, it works anyway.. "David (Lord Kronos) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-23 11:26 -0800
  Re: FUCK The Laws of Physics, it works anyway.. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-23 12:13 -0800
    Re: FUCK The Laws of Physics, it works anyway.. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-24 10:48 -0800
    Re: FUCK The Laws of Physics, it works anyway.. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-26 14:17 -0800

csiph-web