Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #397442
| Message-ID | <58194928.47A7@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-01 18:02 -0800 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy, rec.arts.tv |
| Subject | Re: Might be the next Holo-Hoop... |
| References | <58177147.7D4D@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
The Starmaker wrote: > > I've got an idea that I will start working on soon... > an invention. > Might be the next Hula-Hoop... > > I cannot explain the technical details of 'how it works' because that > is the 'secret sauce'. > > But I will explain what it does... > > It's glasses. A kid puts it on and sees girls naked. > > The glasses is a mixed reality computing with virtual and > physical real-world elements. > > So, the kid first has to scan the girl with his glasses, and > in a few minutes...he sees her naked! He tells her to > turn around and he sees her turn around and sees her back naked. > > If she walks around or sits, he sees her walking or sitting naked. > > Of course, the naked body he sees is computer generated, but > if he gives the glasses to his friend to look at her, he will not be able > to tell it is computer generated naked body on her. It will look real. > All the movements will be synchronized. > > Of course the kid will have to scan all the girls in school to see them all > naked but that might require a bigger holographic computer built into a headset > helmet like instead of glasses. Would require too much computing power. > > Made only for one scan/girl per glasses, or the kid's English teacher. Better than what they sold through comic books... https://www.google.com/#q=comic+book+x-ray+glasses+ad https://c8.staticflickr.com/8/7524/15926708855_373468b6ee_c.jpg
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Might be the next Holo-Hoop... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-31 08:28 -0800
Re: Might be the next Holo-Hoop... "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-10-31 12:22 -0400
Re: Might be the next Holo-Hoop... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-01 18:02 -0800
Re: Might be the next Holo-Hoop... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-01 18:04 -0800
Re: Might be the next Holo-Hoop... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-01 18:39 -0800
Re: Might be the next Holo-Hoop... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-01 18:42 -0800
Re: Might be the next Holo-Hoop... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-02 12:21 -0800
csiph-web