Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #389609

Re: The Mind of Satan

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Peter Trei wrote:
> >
> > On Monday, August 8, 2016 at 11:14:38 PM UTC-4, J. Clarke wrote:
> > > In article <d419c451-9085-403e-9270-a4834762df5f@googlegroups.com>,
> > > tsbrueni@dcn.davis.ca.us says...
> > > >
> > > > On Sunday, August 7, 2016 at 5:41:48 PM UTC-7, J. Clarke wrote:
> > > > > In article <958dc36e-14fb-460e-946c-55d639d9c945@googlegroups.com>,
> > > > > tsbrueni@dcn.davis.ca.us says...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sunday, August 7, 2016 at 12:54:53 PM UTC-7, Poutnik wrote:
> > > > > > > Dne 07/08/2016 v 21:40 Poutnik napsal(a):
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > His reasoning is well known,
> > > > > > > > and must be evaluated in historical context.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > P.S.>
> > > > > > > Einstein speeded up the development just by few years,
> > > > > > > by political rather then scientific means.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The bomb would be developed anyway by whatever party.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Such as the USSR?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If had not deployed on Japanese cities, who knows
> > > > > > > what alternative history we would have passed.
> > > > > > > Perhaps we would afraid nukes less than we do now.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We might have Russia ruling at least half of Japan!  (Our A-Bombs forced Japan to surrender before Russia could take more than a few Japanese islands).
> > > > >
> > > > > Or alternatively the Russians taking a few islands led to the Japanese
> > > > > surrendering regardless of nuclear weapons.,
> > > >
> > > > The Japanese had fought like demons against the Allied forces heretofore.  I see no reason for them to surrender over a few islands!
> > >
> > > The Japanese are many things, but fools is not one of them.  Given the
> > > choice between Soviet occupation and US occupation, which would _you_
> > > take?
> >
> > I once read an account by one of the Japanese senior command of the top brass'
> > reaction. He was on the 'surrender faction', and said that the thing which
> > really affected peoples attitudes was that the US had destroyed the city with
> > *one* *single* *device*, and they had no idea how many more would be coming.
> >
> > pt
> 
> That Japaneese senior command of the top brass was refering to Albert Einstein device:
> 
> "...that extremely powerful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this
> 
> type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy
> 
> the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory." -Albert Einstein
> 
> http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml#first
> 
> All the japaneese people know there is only one man to blame for that...
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html
> 
> The Starmaker
> 
> but then...Albert Einstein try to appologize to the Japaneese people...he said:
> 
> "Hey Man, they were fucking trying to kill me!!!!"
> 
> ""...Such a case would be when I face an opponent whose unconditional aim is to destroy me..." --Albert Einstein
> 
> http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/feat/archives/2005/07/05/2003262351
> 
> Albert Einstein was saying.."I didn't want them to kill the fuckin chinks, I wanted them to kill the fuckin KRAUTS!!!!"
> 
> "...That means there are circumstances in which in my opinion it is necessary to use force," --Albert Einsetin
> 
> and by "force' he means...THE FUCKIN ATOMIC BOMB!!!!


copy of the letter einstein sent? (it's in Jermen) (anybody speak kraut?) actung, actung..mach schnell..

http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/the-picture-shows-a-copy-of-one-of-letters-which-japanese-news-photo/103251407#the-picture-shows-a-copy-of-one-of-letters-which-japanese-philosopher-picture-id103251407

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

The Mind of Satan The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-07 12:11 -0700
  Re: The Mind of Satan Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 21:40 +0200
    Re: The Mind of Satan Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 21:54 +0200
      Re: The Mind of Satan The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-07 13:54 -0700
      Re: The Mind of Satan The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-07 17:57 -0700
      Re: The Mind of Satan The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-09 12:53 -0700
        Re: The Mind of Satan The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-09 13:03 -0700
    Re: The Mind of Satan Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-08-07 23:15 +0200
      Re: The Mind of Satan Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 16:15 -0700
    Re: The Mind of Satan Robert Bannister <robban@clubtelco.com> - 2016-08-08 08:55 +0800
      Re: The Mind of Satan Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 06:46 +0200

csiph-web