Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #382759
| Path | csiph.com!au2pb.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Tue, 03 May 2016 22:45:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <57297099.4BCA@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| Date | Tue, 03 May 2016 20:46:33 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Reply-To | starmaker@ix.netcom.com |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: dark matter |
| References | <7de2db9a-83a8-4e3d-bfe2-1dc4592330e3@googlegroups.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Lines | 29 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 108.219.229.47 |
| X-Trace | sv3-eK19v/5MWq57eIn9xtfymzuZ1rBQb5NLoH5okQA5xGhlET8YLIiI6IqiJQOPzCmt4+N/0KCUegsTDZR!+lrv78rjD19dxNeuuJuy+3i/32Mj6QbtYxsuQeh0irRRL7J6PXyHFzMcP+2YhnpGGgkFshHSiFiX!qKGrGWuy7ao= |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 2013 |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:382759 |
Show key headers only | View raw
RichD wrote: > > OK, we don't know what this 'dark matter' stuff is, > and there's a worldwide race to detect it. My question > is, what DO we know about it? Or, what are the working assumptions? > > For instance, is it supposed to fit into the existing > fermion/boson structure? There seems to be an assumption > that it's uncharged... reason? Perhaps it does carry > electric charge, which all cancels out, per the usual > 'no net universal charge' pseudo-law of science. > > Or, maybe it's some kind of field, which fills the universe, > a la Higgs. Is there reason to reject this? > > Also, its distribution is unclear - it binds galaxies, > does that necessarily mean it's uniformly distributed? > There are some allusions to a "halo", whatever that means. > > I'm trying to figure out what's known, and what's ruled out - > > -- > Rich what binds galaxies is gravity. That which they call 'dark matter' is actually just...Gravity.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
dark matter RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-03 10:14 -0700
Re: dark matter Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-05-03 12:41 -0500
Re: dark matter "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-03 23:53 -0700
Re: dark matter "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-03 23:54 -0700
Re: dark matter dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2016-05-04 07:34 -0700
Re: dark matter Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-04 09:55 -0700
Re: dark matter dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2016-05-04 12:37 -0700
Re: dark matter Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-04 14:52 -0700
Re: dark matter "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 10:32 -0700
Re: dark matter Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-05-06 10:38 -0500
Re: dark matter dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2016-05-06 10:25 -0700
Re: dark matter Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-05-06 10:27 -0500
Re: dark matter "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-06 10:42 -0700
Re: dark matter "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-06 10:58 -0700
Re: dark matter dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2016-05-06 11:33 -0700
Re: dark matter "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-06 12:51 -0700
Re: dark matter "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-06 12:58 -0700
Re: dark matter Francis Oldogf <francisoldogf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-08 03:11 -0700
Re: dark matter Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-05-08 03:44 -0700
Re: dark matter dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2016-05-08 11:22 -0700
Re: dark matter Francis Oldogf <francisoldogf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-09 07:19 -0700
Re: dark matter "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-09 11:40 -0700
Re: dark matter RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-04 10:54 -0700
Re: dark matter "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 12:00 -0700
Re: dark matter dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2016-05-04 12:40 -0700
Re: dark matter dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2016-05-04 12:47 -0700
Re: dark matter Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-05-09 11:16 -0500
Re: dark matter "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-09 11:52 -0700
Re: dark matter RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-10 11:36 -0700
Re: dark matter Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-10 12:11 -0700
Re: dark matter Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-03 12:57 -0500
Re: dark matter dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2016-05-03 12:17 -0700
Re: dark matter Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-05-03 17:58 -0500
Re: dark matter dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2016-05-03 17:03 -0700
Re: dark matter Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-05-03 17:37 -0700
Re: dark matter dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2016-05-03 17:46 -0700
Re: dark matter Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 13:20 -0700
Re: dark matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-03 20:46 -0700
Re: dark matter dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2016-05-04 07:39 -0700
Re: dark matter "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 10:36 -0700
Re: dark matter Carl Susumu <numbernumber1212@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 13:26 -0700
Re: dark matter Carl Susumu <numbernumber1212@gmail.com> - 2016-05-09 12:57 -0700
Re: dark matter alsor@interia.pl - 2016-05-10 12:38 -0700
Re: dark matter Francis Oldogf <francisoldogf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 03:54 -0700
Re: dark matter nero <oldogf@yahoo.it> - 2016-05-14 08:05 -0700
dark matter David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-11 06:30 -0700
Re: dark matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-11 12:41 -0700
Re: dark matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-11 18:47 -0700
csiph-web