Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #382168

Re: Earth's core younger than its crust or science is insane?

Show all headers | View raw

Of course the earth's core is younger than it's crust...
the earth's core did not form untill the very end..

to give you a simple example (cause i don't want to go over your heads)

you boil
an egg..
(like the earth's sun boils the earth)

after 3 minutes the center core of the egg
is ready..

cut the egg in half
after it's boiled 
and see for yourself... 

If you cut the egg
before it is completely formed
the core will be...gooey.

It hasn't formed yet.


You don't need to be a rockit sciencentist to know the "Earth's core
younger than its crust".



Pentcho Valev wrote:
> 
> https://www.newscientist.com/article/2085599-earths-core-is-two-and-a-half-years-younger-than-its-crust/
> 
> 
> No such effect has ever been observed. Einsteinians measure the gravitational redshift but then inform the gullible world that they have measured gravitational time dilation, a miraculous difference in the clocks' rates fabricated by Einstein in 1911:
> 
> http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/einsteins-gravitational-redshift-measured-with-unprecedented-precision/
>  "A new paper co-authored by U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu measures the gravitational redshift, illustrated by the gravity-induced slowing of a clock and sometimes referred to as gravitational time dilation (though users of that term often conflate two separate phenomena), a measurement that jibes with Einstein and that is 10,000 times more precise than its predecessor."
> 
> http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/apr/22/record-breaking-clock-invented-which-only-loses-a-second-in-15-billion-years
>  "Einstein's relativity theory states a clock must tick faster at the top of a mountain than at its foot, due to the effects of gravity. "Our performance means that we can measure the gravitational shift when you raise the clock just two centimetres (0.78 inches) on the Earth's surface," said study co-author Jun Ye."
> 
> Clever Einsteinians know that gravitational time dilation does not exist. The gravitational redshift (blueshift) is not due to time dilation - rather, it is the result of "what befalls light signals as they traverse space and time in the presence of gravitation":
> 
> http://www.amazon.com/Relativity-Its-Roots-Banesh-Hoffmann/dp/0486406768
> 
> 
> What befalls light signals as they traverse space and time in the presence of gravitation? They accelerate of course, just as ordinary falling objects do, and this variation of the speed of light (predicted by Newton's emission theory of light) causes the gravitational redshift (or blueshift):
> 
> http://courses.physics.illinois.edu/phys419/sp2013/Lectures/l13.pdf
> 
> 
> http://www.einstein-online.info/spotlights/redshift_white_dwarfs
> 
> 
> Pentcho Valev

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Earth's core younger than its crust or science is insane? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-23 06:54 -0700
  Re: Earth's core younger than its crust or science is insane? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-23 13:12 -0700
  Re: Earth's core younger than its crust or science is insane? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-23 14:12 -0700
    Re: Earth's core younger than its crust or science is insane? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-25 23:20 -0700
  Re: Earth's core younger than its crust or science is insane? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-04-23 16:59 -0500
    Re: Earth's core younger than its crust or science is insane? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-04-24 00:19 +0200
      Re: Earth's core younger than its crust or science is insane? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-23 19:13 -0700
        Re: Earth's core younger than its crust or science is insane? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-04-24 19:56 +0200
  Re: Earth's core younger than its crust or science is insane? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-23 23:34 -0700
    Re: Earth's core younger than its crust or science is insane? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-24 05:52 -0700
      Re: Earth's core younger than its crust or science is insane? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-04-24 19:58 +0200
        Re: Earth's core younger than its crust or science is insane? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-24 19:26 -0700
    Re: Earth's core younger than its crust or science is insane? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-25 05:43 -0700
  Earth's core younger than its crust or science is insane? David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-25 20:09 -0700

csiph-web