Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #376596

Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity

Path	csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date	Sat, 20 Feb 2016 00:51:38 -0600
Message-ID	<56C80D20.3BFD@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	Fri, 19 Feb 2016 22:52:16 -0800
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To	starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer	Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version	1.0
Newsgroups	rec.arts.sf.written, alt.astronomy, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity
References	<2ecfb42a-7db8-4b69-ba34-ae1d7b346aa8@googlegroups.com> <a50c8b63-7871-4f39-941d-f09d7c7553e7@googlegroups.com> <56C774D2.4AFE@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Lines	15
X-Usenet-Provider	http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host	162.239.141.5
X-Trace	sv3-AccFP8/2y9EJuDy2pXvoxHUGiMcQ9Pln++rv7XAHPKUEpWfPbgvPBsbMGBsbe4qw36Uw55PqA/73dxj!xAdXSSqhBWJpduUc9zk6ZD81tSUR4ZAMJKI6q9cD7ikoW1RBiR1RGMAwxc7ORT0Yh465bbpCKlMc!Dl6QRi6PHg==
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter	1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes	1762
X-Received-Bytes	1874
X-Received-Body-CRC	4091043636
Xref	csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:433666 alt.astronomy:282309 sci.physics:554854 sci.physics.relativity:376596

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> mr.hvac@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > Spocks...@gmail.com
> > In Tesla's gravitational theory gravity is a secondary force, Newton's apple does not fall to the ground because of the downward force of gravity but because of the upward momentum of EMR or light. Gravity is not a real force at all. Objects just free-fall towards the greatest mass or energy because they have the slowest rate or flow of time.
> 
> really, i didn't know that.



I'm not sure what "fall" means...


i mean...if it is not at rest then it's...coasting, not falling, right?

Thread

Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 12:02 -0800
  Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-19 18:59 -0800
    Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-19 19:04 -0800
      Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-19 19:09 -0800
      Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-19 19:15 -0800
        Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-19 19:28 -0800
          Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-19 19:33 -0800
    Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-19 19:12 -0800
      Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-19 19:37 -0800
  Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 22:52 -0800
    Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 23:11 -0800
      Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-20 18:43 -0800
        Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-20 18:57 -0800
          Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-20 19:00 -0800
            Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-20 19:13 -0800
              Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-21 18:28 -0800
        Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity Stzepan Zdrobněliny <stzepan282@guadalajara.org> - 2016-02-21 15:44 +0000

csiph-web