Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #376272

Re: I'm seriously disappointed

Path csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:53:08 -0600
Message-ID <56C2026A.7EE3@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date Mon, 15 Feb 2016 08:52:58 -0800
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version 1.0
Newsgroups rec.arts.sf.written, alt.astronomy, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: I'm seriously disappointed
References <n9mhb9$ifu$1@dont-email.me> <56C1037C.16DD@ix.netcom.com> <56C103BC.2015@ix.netcom.com> <56C11BB9.35F3@ix.netcom.com> <0Adwy.55919$3C6.22748@fx21.iad>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Lines 79
X-Usenet-Provider http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host 162.239.141.5
X-Trace sv3-PaN0osasgBBAGRds54pAiKRAD12nmkzxKSoUmP1kPWMR3clW3w2NvjTQzv/iUztvd/zwI4HVrywjzNX!bVsEXdfaSr42AYFlQENOme9JPc6U9u3DAS9+p1wyC0QvoUFWm/uf/yCSOCWTeLcI9GMdME2JnKiL!OkdZmXUYmw==
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes 3557
Xref csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:433301 alt.astronomy:282129 sci.physics:553365 sci.physics.relativity:376272

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


benj wrote:
> 
> On 02/14/2016 07:28 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Dan Tilque wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I haven't seen a single Starmaker post disparaging the gravitational
> >>>> wave discovery. Maybe he posted one but didn't crosspost to sf.written,
> >>>> which is where I see his posts. Even if that's the case, I'm still
> >>>> disappointed he didn't post it here.
> >>>>
> >>>> Come on, man. I need my Starmaker fix!
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Dan Tilque
> >>>
> >>> In the year 2013 I mentioned "Electorgravity"...but America wasn't ready for it.
> >>>
> >>> Gravity sometime acts like a wave, gravity somes acts like a particle.
> >>>
> >>> I don't have time for 'Science' to catch up with me...
> >>>
> >>> I don't disparage that which I already discovered..
> >>>
> >>> The Starmaker
> >>>
> >>> You like sf. did you read the story about the girl looking for her cat and finds a time machine in the basment?
> >>
> >> electrogravity
> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/rec.arts.sf.written/12gvbjCbEQ0/myQHpiDOaQgJ
> >
> >
> >
> > ...most people don't understand the relationship between electricity and gravity.
> >
> >
> > both act like charges..like light waves..photons.
> >
> > Light comes from gravity...not the sun.
> >
> >
> > The sun maunfactures light, but gets it source from gravity.
> >
> > Gravity keep the speed of light from going faster than the speed of light.
> >
> >
> > If an apple hits you on the head, what controls the speed of the apple from the tree to your head? The same thing that controls the speed of light, right?
> >
> 
> Starfaker you are seriously an idiot. Have you been stealing "theories"
> from Glazier again?


I understand your 'drive-by' answers...it shows you don't know much about anything.


Gravity determines what the speed of light should be..to the exact decimal.

Gravity also makes it rain...


with me, the Science I know.. contain no mysteries.

Without mystery...your Science ...would end the continuing supply
funds.


So, your Science.. depends on creating mystery where none exist...to ensure the continuing supply
of funds.



Without mystery, you guys would be selling hot dogs..to ensure the continuing supply
of funds.

Try attending a hamburger university..

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

I'm seriously disappointed Dan Tilque <dtilque@frontier.com> - 2016-02-12 22:11 -0800
  Re: I'm seriously disappointed The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-14 14:45 -0800
    Re: I'm seriously disappointed The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-14 14:46 -0800
      Re: I'm seriously disappointed The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-14 16:28 -0800
        Re: I'm seriously disappointed benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 00:43 -0500
          Re: I'm seriously disappointed The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-15 08:52 -0800
            Re: I'm seriously disappointed The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-15 23:09 -0800
              Re: I'm seriously disappointed The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 22:33 -0800
                Re: I'm seriously disappointed Robert Bannister <robban@clubtelco.com> - 2016-02-18 08:55 +0800
                Re: I'm seriously disappointed benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 01:27 -0500
    Re: I'm seriously disappointed Dan Tilque <dtilque@frontier.com> - 2016-02-15 17:48 -0800
  Re: I'm seriously disappointed The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-14 23:41 -0800

csiph-web