Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #376256

Re: I'm seriously disappointed

Path	csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!news.glorb.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date	Mon, 15 Feb 2016 01:41:33 -0600
Message-ID	<56C18124.613E@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	Sun, 14 Feb 2016 23:41:24 -0800
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To	starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer	Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version	1.0
Newsgroups	rec.arts.sf.written, alt.astronomy, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: I'm seriously disappointed
References	<n9mhb9$ifu$1@dont-email.me> <22a8faab-7b0b-4d71-8354-1d40d8f63553@googlegroups.com> <n9o88q$lho$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Lines	26
X-Usenet-Provider	http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host	162.239.141.5
X-Trace	sv3-AbIZvER4MUvbr2+N1PRofjoxHcw4oU63gfX1Ubk1KDMmfh+km76n6jjMO2koQ7e141I8dIH9mkLKYXL!iuSIjD+K7FIdWL18OIGf08iJfqQyFBbXVfJdk8AKKElz3qRcSf3lYPuT/0sA3WhgUsNsZzk9daqR!6xZ1dEgmQw==
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter	1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes	1868
Xref	csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:433290 alt.astronomy:282114 sci.physics:553284 sci.physics.relativity:376256

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Dan Tilque wrote:
> 
> Robert Carnegie wrote:
> > On Saturday, 13 February 2016 06:12:43 UTC, Dan Tilque  wrote:
> >> I haven't seen a single Starmaker post disparaging the gravitational
> >> wave discovery. ...
> >>
> >> Come on, man. I need my Starmaker fix!
> >
> > You missed it.  Title, "Whoop."
> 
> Yes, I did miss that. Title was too vague.
> 
> >
> > There isn't the usual blank-verse commentary - if you don't
> > count the subject line itself.
> 
> Very anemic on his part. Come on man, if you're going to be an
> anti-science head-in-the-sand Luddite, put a little effort into it.
> 
> --
> Dan Tilque


Isn't  rec.arts.sf.written anti-science???? ...with a little effort into
it.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

I'm seriously disappointed Dan Tilque <dtilque@frontier.com> - 2016-02-12 22:11 -0800
  Re: I'm seriously disappointed The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-14 14:45 -0800
    Re: I'm seriously disappointed The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-14 14:46 -0800
      Re: I'm seriously disappointed The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-14 16:28 -0800
        Re: I'm seriously disappointed benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 00:43 -0500
          Re: I'm seriously disappointed The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-15 08:52 -0800
            Re: I'm seriously disappointed The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-15 23:09 -0800
              Re: I'm seriously disappointed The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 22:33 -0800
                Re: I'm seriously disappointed Robert Bannister <robban@clubtelco.com> - 2016-02-18 08:55 +0800
                Re: I'm seriously disappointed benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 01:27 -0500
    Re: I'm seriously disappointed Dan Tilque <dtilque@frontier.com> - 2016-02-15 17:48 -0800
  Re: I'm seriously disappointed The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-14 23:41 -0800

csiph-web