Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #373981
| From | Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Einstein Explains the Twin Paradox |
| Date | 2016-01-14 13:28 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <569804D0.4030107@comcast.net> (permalink) |
| References | <9bcc91c8-b13d-458c-8453-91b462af86d1@googlegroups.com> <de145868-cd13-4841-93fe-530a6dccb329@googlegroups.com> <n7899i$3ks$1@news.albasani.net> <5697BBF1.9010207@comcast.net> |
On 1/14/16 8:17 AM, Mike Fontenot wrote: > > [...] > That additional issue is whether the twin who > accelerates can determine the current age of the unaccelerating twin at > each of his own ages during his trip. > The common answer to the question "Why doesn't the "traveling twin" conclude that the home twin will be the younger one when they are reunited" is that the fact that the "traveling twin" accelerates at the turnaround breaks the symmetry between the two twins. Although this answer is correct, it still understandably leaves many people dissatisfied, and feeling that there must be more to the story than that. A more complete answer is that the "traveling twin" DOES conclude that the home twin is ageing more slowly during all portions of the trip where the "traveler" isn't accelerating (which, in the usual scenario is ALMOST ALL of the trip). But during the turnaround (no matter how brief), the accelerating twin will conclude that the home twin suddenly ages by a very large amount. That sudden ageing is so great that it makes the total ageing of the home twin at the end of the trip be much greater than the "traveler's" total ageing. The two twins will always agree about their corresponding ages at the end of the trip, even though they completely disagree about the correspondence between their ages at (most) other times during the trip. -- https://sites.google.com/site/cadoequation/cado-reference-frame "Accelerated Observers in Special Relativity", PHYSICS ESSAYS, December 1999, p629. All you ever need to know about the twin "paradox".
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Einstein Explains the Twin Paradox Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-14 04:08 -0800
Re: Einstein Explains the Twin Paradox Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-14 04:57 -0800
Re: Einstein Explains the Twin Paradox "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-01-14 14:53 +0100
Re: Einstein Explains the Twin Paradox Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2016-01-14 08:12 -0700
Re: Einstein Explains the Twin Paradox Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2016-01-14 08:17 -0700
Re: Einstein Explains the Twin Paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-14 17:20 +0100
Re: Einstein Explains the Twin Paradox Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2016-01-14 13:28 -0700
Re: Einstein Explains the Twin Paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-14 22:06 +0100
Re: Einstein Explains the Twin Paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-14 10:13 -0800
Einstein Explains the Twin Paradox Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-14 05:48 -0800
Re: Einstein Explains the Twin Paradox Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-14 06:07 -0800
Einstein Explains the Twin Paradox Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-15 18:03 -0800
Re: Einstein Explains the Twin Paradox Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-01-14 09:47 -0600
Re: Einstein Explains the Twin Paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-14 10:23 -0800
Re: Einstein Explains the Twin Paradox Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-14 11:45 -0800
Re: Einstein Explains the Twin Paradox David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-14 07:58 -0800
Re: Einstein Explains the Twin Paradox jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-01-14 08:31 -0800
csiph-web