Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #360303

Re: Junk Science

Path	csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date	Mon, 10 Aug 2015 23:51:15 -0500
Message-ID	<55C97F7F.649B@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	Mon, 10 Aug 2015 21:52:15 -0700
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To	starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer	Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version	1.0
Newsgroups	rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.math, sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Junk Science
References	<55C8DED9.755C@ix.netcom.com> <mqan2p$n9p$1@news.datemas.de> <nsvnzG.ur3@kithrup.com> <1br3nb57od.fsf@pfeifferfamily.net> <55C8ED6D.45BB@ix.netcom.com> <mqb2mr$vb$1@speranza.aioe.org> <55C9440E.33BA@ix.netcom.com> <mqbn4a$ehd$3@speranza.aioe.org>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Lines	64
X-Usenet-Provider	http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host	23.241.144.149
X-Trace	sv3-I1DRFERU/qxesoQUqGD3r6Dgp1js8LtZZ7b1jGk281knoFfFvwC+Cu22PMevl016q28PW8FrNZL9mVa!qQTxzl/afvTMnKeCjMztcuxg3EF6OyO1nI66RT/5gNctXsm50sdyEx7jJBve2EL4HfgGXnr2vBye!STOv3NdWoVc=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter	1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes	3122
Xref	csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:419650 sci.physics:512611 sci.math:313260 sci.physics.relativity:360303

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

gilber34 wrote:
> 
> On 8/10/2015 7:38 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > gilber34 wrote:
> >>
> >> On 8/10/2015 1:29 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) writes:
> >>> f nobody ever responded to the Starmaker?
> >>>>> Then I wouldn't see his silly posts at all.
> 
> >> the media, reporters who cannot understand basic science, because
> >> the reporters failed science and math courses and had to take a
> >> lower path into journalism, where subject knowledge is not needed.
> >
> >
> > "basic science"???
> >
> > https://www.google.com/#q=define+basic+science
> >
> > You don't acutally believe members of the 'scientific community'
> > understand...."basic science"????
> >
> >
> > Definition of BASIC SCIENCE. : any one of the sciences (such as
> > anatomy, physiology, bacteriology, pathology, or biochemistry)
> > fundamental to the study of medicine.
> >
> >
> >
> > Why are you bring up ....the study of medicine???
> 
> ...... but thats' what druggies do too, study meds,
> 
> REM Google is recording all the sites you visit and redirects your
> search to what THEY think you want


Google is not in the search engine business, they are in the advertising business. 



> 
> >
> >
> > Maybe You don't understand...basic science.
> 
> I understand advanced science, but not "basic" science, the stuff
> written in the BASIC programming language,
> 

BASIC is not advanced programing.


> REM - it gives me a headace.
> 
> >
> >
> > And certaintly 'science journalist' don't understand...any science!
> 
> they, science journalists, are only required to have previously reported
> on something that may have looked scientific, or someone told them it
> was sciency like, or if it was in a movie, or could have been.

Thread

Junk Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-10 10:26 -0700
  Re: Junk Science Alan Baker <email@domain.com> - 2015-08-10 10:30 -0700
    Re: Junk Science djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-08-10 17:45 +0000
      Re: Junk Science Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2015-08-10 12:18 -0600
        Re: Junk Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-10 11:29 -0700
          Re: Junk Science gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-10 15:48 -0500
            Re: Junk Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-10 17:38 -0700
              Re: Junk Science gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-10 21:36 -0500
                Re: Junk Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-10 21:52 -0700
                Re: Junk Science gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-11 19:13 -0500
      Re: Junk Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-10 11:21 -0700
    Re: Junk Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-10 11:15 -0700
      Re: Junk Science gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-10 22:39 -0500
        Re: Junk Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-10 22:16 -0700
          Re: Junk Science gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-11 17:23 -0500
  Re: Junk Science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-10 20:55 +0200

csiph-web