Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #360289

Re: Junk Science

Path csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date Mon, 10 Aug 2015 19:38:14 -0500
Message-ID <55C9440E.33BA@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:38:38 -0700
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version 1.0
Newsgroups rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.math, sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Junk Science
References <55C8DED9.755C@ix.netcom.com> <mqan2p$n9p$1@news.datemas.de> <nsvnzG.ur3@kithrup.com> <1br3nb57od.fsf@pfeifferfamily.net> <55C8ED6D.45BB@ix.netcom.com> <mqb2mr$vb$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Lines 43
X-Usenet-Provider http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host 23.241.144.149
X-Trace sv3-oGIkT7Hnmek3Kft3dVWZk/+RzEg3dtE+HQYwWUsbVcaHsODGhZsKKY3Y7EjY6UE1rlDcIjmDCubC/QE!DJfYFqYO88SCxaHB23wOLJkD5jzjKG4nDPjMrVXZg923w/bwgj4Kmxmj+Va56qjRqAfVQV1KRAEJ!j/+bcLGLe5Y=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes 2445
Xref csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:419623 sci.physics:512595 sci.math:313255 sci.physics.relativity:360289

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

gilber34 wrote:
> 
> On 8/10/2015 1:29 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> >>
> >> djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) writes:
> >f nobody ever responded to the Starmaker?
> >>> Then I wouldn't see his silly posts at all.
> >>
> >> Me too.  That would be so cool...
> >
> >
> >
> > it seems  that the community is filled with 'wishful thinkers'...a source of junk science.
> >
> >
> >
> > science fiction writers are another source...but that is to be expected.
> >
> 
> the media, reporters who cannot understand basic science, because the
> reporters failed science and math courses and had to take a lower path
> into journalism, where subject knowledge is not needed.


"basic science"??? 

https://www.google.com/#q=define+basic+science

You don't acutally believe members of the 'scientific community' understand...."basic science"????


Definition of BASIC SCIENCE. : any one of the sciences (such as anatomy, physiology, bacteriology, pathology, or biochemistry) fundamental to the study of medicine.



Why are you bring up ....the study of medicine???


Maybe You don't understand...basic science.


And certaintly 'science journalist' don't understand...any science!

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Junk Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-10 10:26 -0700
  Re: Junk Science Alan Baker <email@domain.com> - 2015-08-10 10:30 -0700
    Re: Junk Science djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-08-10 17:45 +0000
      Re: Junk Science Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2015-08-10 12:18 -0600
        Re: Junk Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-10 11:29 -0700
          Re: Junk Science gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-10 15:48 -0500
            Re: Junk Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-10 17:38 -0700
              Re: Junk Science gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-10 21:36 -0500
                Re: Junk Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-10 21:52 -0700
                Re: Junk Science gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-11 19:13 -0500
      Re: Junk Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-10 11:21 -0700
    Re: Junk Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-10 11:15 -0700
      Re: Junk Science gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-10 22:39 -0500
        Re: Junk Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-10 22:16 -0700
          Re: Junk Science gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-11 17:23 -0500
  Re: Junk Science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-10 20:55 +0200

csiph-web