Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #360233

Re: Junk Science

Path	csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date	Mon, 10 Aug 2015 13:21:08 -0500
Message-ID	<55C8EB96.29C4@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	Mon, 10 Aug 2015 11:21:10 -0700
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To	starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer	Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version	1.0
Newsgroups	rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.math, sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Junk Science
References	<55C8DED9.755C@ix.netcom.com> <mqan2p$n9p$1@news.datemas.de> <nsvnzG.ur3@kithrup.com>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Lines	27
X-Usenet-Provider	http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host	23.241.144.149
X-Trace	sv3-Yzsi0pYQkTVQXU9tuV88J1yx9vqF+ThylwJFF/bdw6zvgpOMVcTFqSfJuJs4FhEs9Ik57y5jTyDINFa!jO+wbivy6zU39Xpy/IahropOWBvdBOlP9VNtHxA2xX1B1Xd+tN5IE4YiCiX0E6neODzDSr0arcMp!tLIkiCz0nXM=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter	1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes	1891
X-Received-Bytes	2003
X-Received-Body-CRC	3806708097
Xref	csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:419599 sci.physics:512462 sci.math:313212 sci.physics.relativity:360233

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Dorothy J Heydt wrote:
> 
> In article <mqan2p$n9p$1@news.datemas.de>,
> Alan Baker  <email@domain.com> wrote:
> >On 2015-08-10 17:26:49 +0000, The Starmaker said:
> >
> >> How do you protect yourself from Junk Science?
> >
> >It starts with not paying any attention to you...
> >
> 
> Wouldn't it be nice if nobody ever responded to the Starmaker?
> Then I wouldn't see his silly posts at all.

That is what I call "Junk Science", because that isn't how nature works.

It's what it is called in the 'scientific community'....wishful thinking.

And we need to be protected from the likes of the Dorthy's in the world...with
their wishful thinking junk science.

Get rid of all the wishful thinkers in the 'scientific community'...is that even possible????

Thread

Junk Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-10 10:26 -0700
  Re: Junk Science Alan Baker <email@domain.com> - 2015-08-10 10:30 -0700
    Re: Junk Science djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-08-10 17:45 +0000
      Re: Junk Science Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2015-08-10 12:18 -0600
        Re: Junk Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-10 11:29 -0700
          Re: Junk Science gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-10 15:48 -0500
            Re: Junk Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-10 17:38 -0700
              Re: Junk Science gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-10 21:36 -0500
                Re: Junk Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-10 21:52 -0700
                Re: Junk Science gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-11 19:13 -0500
      Re: Junk Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-10 11:21 -0700
    Re: Junk Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-10 11:15 -0700
      Re: Junk Science gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-10 22:39 -0500
        Re: Junk Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-10 22:16 -0700
          Re: Junk Science gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-11 17:23 -0500
  Re: Junk Science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-10 20:55 +0200

csiph-web