Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #370831

Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Followups directed to: alt.1d

Show all headers | View raw

The ’nym-shifting troll posted as “Jack Monaco”:

> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>>>> Three months will suffice.
>>>> In general, no.
>>> Even one month would be pretty okay, depending on the brightness and
>>> the atmospheric condition.  […]
>> One month might be OK.  Three months would certainly not, as the
>> pertinent stars would either not be visible in the night sky or they
>> would only be visible shortly before or after dawn/sunset – non-ideal
>> observation conditions.
> 
> I understand you realized you've been caught insufficient once again.

If only you knew what ridiculous gibberish you are spouting.
  
> However, "stars not visible in the night sky"?? When?

“Above the same location” is implied here.  You do not carry a 3+ m 
telescope around the globe, you know.

> Can't you just use another lie.

It is not a lie.  Use astronomy software to find out, as your cortex 
simulation is obviously failing you.  I can recommend Celestia for finding 
the dates of the eclipses and Stellarium for a realistic simulation of the 
observation conditions 3 and 6 months before/after it.  I could prove it to 
you with examples of stars, but in your case that would be a waste of time.  
You only want to troll.

> After one month there is a 30⁰ separation between the stars and the Sun.
> Three will give 90⁰.

What a mindbogglingly stupid nonsense.  You did not even get the unit of 
angles right: it is “°” (degree), not “⁰” (superscript zero).
 
>>> Just draw a tangent bordering the dark hemisphere,
>>> pointedhead. One more proof on your halfengineering concern.
>> 
>> Once again you have no clue what you are talking about.  All you can do
>> is throwing insults, although not very imaginative ones.
> 
> Insults me? Facts can't be insults.

What you are posting are not facts, but wishful thinking.

> I am a newcomer to this forum.

No, you are just an old idiot with a new pseudonym.

> Nice to meet you.

Whom are you kidding?  Not everyone is as stupid as you, “Jack”.  Go on, get 
a new ’nym.  Nobody will notice.  Trust me.

*PLONK*


PointedEars
-- 
Q: What did the nuclear physicist order for lunch?  
A: Fission chips.

(from: WolframAlpha)

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Stars behind the Sun - revisited Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> - 2015-11-23 17:50 +0000
  Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> - 2015-11-23 21:51 +0000
  Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-24 03:17 +0000
    Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-24 01:49 -0500
      Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-24 09:30 -0800
    Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-24 11:59 +0000
      Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-24 18:22 +0000
        Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbertopal.org> - 2015-11-24 21:04 +0000
          Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-24 22:08 +0000
            Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbertopal.org> - 2015-11-24 22:42 +0000
              Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-24 22:57 +0000
                Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbBertopal.org> - 2015-11-24 23:19 +0000
                Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-25 00:04 +0000
                Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbBertopal.org> - 2015-11-25 17:25 +0000
        Re: Stars behind the Sun - revisited Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-24 22:17 +0000

csiph-web